Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons orbiting atoms would lose energy due to their changing electric fields, which result from their motion. As an electron moves, it creates a varying electric field that leads to the emission of light. This process is linked to the principles of electromagnetism, where a changing magnetic field induces a changing electric field. The discussion emphasizes that a moving charge alters the electric field at fixed points in space, confirming that the electron's position affects the field's strength and direction. Ultimately, this dynamic interaction explains why orbiting electrons would lose energy over time.
bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I realize they're meant to emit light. But why? I understand vaguely that the E field might be changing with time, since you have a changing magnetic flux... but where does the changing E field come from? Unless I guess it's just a self supporting process (changing B field *causes* changing E here...) - is that just what a light ray is??

Many Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw up a picture of a simple atom, like a hydrogen atom. Ignore the contribution from the atom core to the electric field.

Pick a random point and write down the electric field in that point, draw it again after half a period (For the orbiting electron).

Will the electric field be different in the two pictures.
 
Oh right, for sure. The electron is at a different distance from the point! Sorry!
 
A moving charge always produces a changing E field, that should be obvious. Take any fixed point P in space. At some time, the charge Q is at distance A from P. At some other time, Q is at distance B from P. Because A and B are different, the E field at P must also be different.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top