Is It Possible to Reduce the Effective Mass of a System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical possibility of a technology that could reduce the effective mass of a system while retaining its intrinsic properties. Participants highlight that such a concept violates the conservation of momentum, as changing mass without an external force would alter momentum. One suggestion is that allowing a system to radiate energy could achieve a similar effect, but this would not constitute a true mass reduction technology. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards this idea being more aligned with science fiction than practical science. The concept raises interesting questions, but remains unfeasible within current scientific understanding.
Chronicler1701
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I just want to know, is a technology designed to reduce the effective mass of a system possible, at least in theory?

Within the system, everything acts as it should (it retains all chemical, physical, and structural properties), but outside, it acts as if it had a lower mass. It's not as heavy, and it doesn't take as much energy to move it.

I know it's a long shot, but the idea is interesting, isn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chronicler1701 said:
I just want to know, is a technology designed to reduce the effective mass of a system possible, at least in theory?

Within the system, everything acts as it should (it retains all chemical, physical, and structural properties), but outside, it acts as if it had a lower mass. It's not as heavy, and it doesn't take as much energy to move it.

Violates conservation of momentum. Pick a frame of reference within which this system is moving. It has a certain non-zero momentum. Have it magically reduce its mass. Its momentum has changed without application of any external force.

If you had a system with a lot of energy and allowed that energy to radiate away, then you could achieve the desired result. Conservation of momentum would be preserved because the energy that you radiate would carry away the lost angular momentum. But at that point you don't have a magic mass reducer any more. You just have a photon drive.
 
Chronicler1701 said:
I just want to know, is a technology designed to reduce the effective mass of a system possible, at least in theory?

Only in science fiction. In fact, your question reminds me of the science fiction / comedy movie "Explorers".
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top