Derivation of Phi-Hat wrt Phi in Spherical Unit Vectors

EarthDecon
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I just want to know how to get from this: ∂ø^/∂ø = -x^cosø - y^sinø
to this: = -(r^sinθ+θ^cosθ)

Homework Equations



All the equations found here in the Spherical Coordinates section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_vector

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried a bunch of ways of algebraically getting the answer but I seem to be getting nowhere. Maybe I'm missing an equation. I tried adding and subtracting z^cosθ to get -r^ but I'm still missing the other piece. Please help! Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried going the other way? It is easier (at least more natural) to prove that statement that way, inserting the formulas for \hat{r} and \hat{\theta}.
 
I have not, however, it seems like such a process would be much too long. If someone asked you to solve this for a test, how would one solve this without taking so long to do this? To be fair, if each unit vector derivation (d\hat{r}/dt and d\hat{θ}/dt) was incredibly short, why would this one partial derivative take 30 mins to do (if it does so)? I'll try, but I'd like to start from beginning to end to properly understand the process. I appreciate the reply though, thank you.
 
EarthDecon said:
I have not, however, it seems like such a process would be much too long. If someone asked you to solve this for a test, how would one solve this without taking so long to do this? To be fair, if each unit vector derivation (d\hat{r}/dt and d\hat{θ}/dt) was incredibly short, why would this one partial derivative take 30 mins to do (if it does so)? I'll try, but I'd like to start from beginning to end to properly understand the process. I appreciate the reply though, thank you.

On a test, I'd probably use a geometrical method - essentially drawing and trying to see how each unit axis would change. This particular derivative is probably the trickiest one even using that method though.

However, you wanted an algebraic method. In one direction it looks like a trick to me, in the other way it comes out quite naturally (and that substitution doesn't take very long at all).
 
Oh yes. You were right. I tried the derivation backwards and it only took about half a page. However I probably would never have thought about it, but there is a trick. The trick is to place (sin2θ + cos2θ) multiplying the cosø and the sinø in the equation. Once that's done you distribute out the sinθ in the x-hat and the cosθ in the y-hat and the negative one. Then add and subtract z-hat cosθsinθ and group it so that you get r-hat on one side and phi-hat on the other and you should get the answer.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top