Orienational order parameter in isotropic systems

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the order parameter S in NMR and liquid crystal studies is defined, highlighting its dependence on the angle θ between molecules and a reference direction. It is noted that S equals 0 in isotropic environments, indicating random molecular orientations, while S equals 1 when molecules are perfectly aligned. A participant clarifies that for isotropic distributions, the average value of cos²θ is 1/3, which contributes to S being zero. The calculation involves integrating over the solid angle of 4π, reinforcing the concept of random orientation. Understanding this relationship is crucial for interpreting molecular alignment in various physical contexts.
Liam79
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have what may be a dummy question. In NMR or in the study of liquid crystals for example, an order parameter S is often used:
S=\left\langle\frac{1}{2}\left(3\cos^{2}\theta-1\right)\right\rangle
with \theta the angle of the molecule with a "director" (the magnetic field in NMR, the normal to a membrane for lipids, the global direction in a nematic phase etc). S corresponds to a second-order Legendre polynomial.
I have often read that in an isotropic environment, S=0 whereas when all the molecules are well aligned with the reference vector (director), S=1. I understand why S=1 as \theta=0° but I can't find why S=0 when all the orientations are random.
Can anyone help me?

Liam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For isotropic distribution the average of cos^2 is 1/3.
The average (these brackets) imply an integral over solid angle of 4π.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top