Conversion between density and column density

  • Thread starter Thread starter bagherihan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Column Density
AI Thread Summary
To convert the radial density function n(r) to the density \rho(r) for a spherical cloud, one must consider the relationship between total mass and density. The total mass M can be expressed as M = 4 \pi \int r^2 \rho(r) dr, which is related to column density through M = 2 \pi \int r n(r) dr. However, column density calculations obscure certain information, making direct conversion challenging without specific symmetry in the density distribution. If the density is radially symmetric, the conversion is feasible, but it requires transforming to cylindrical coordinates to accurately account for varying densities at different heights. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate calculations in astrophysical contexts.
bagherihan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What's the way to convert n(r) to \rho(r) in case of a spherical cloud.
n(r) is the column density, \rho(r) is the density.
I tried (but didn't manage) to get it from their relation to the total mass:
M = 4 \pi \int r^2 \rho(r)dr = 2 \pi \int r n(r)dr (is it correct anyway?)
Thank you,
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In general, no there isn't.
The reason being that the column density calculation hides information.

But if you know the density distribution has a special symmetry - i.e. it is radial, then you may be able to.

In this case it appears you have a cloud whose density function depends on on the distance from the center.

\rho(r) is the density of the cloud a distance r from the center, so the mass of the spherical shell between r and r+dr is dm = \rho (4\pi r^2 dr) so the total mass is the integral over all radii. See how that works?

This is r in spherical coordinates.
To get to the column density, you need to convert to cylindrical coordinates.
This is because the column at a horizontal distance r from the center, area dxdy (say) will have a different density for different z values (since different z values will have different spherical r values)

It should be clearer if you use a different symbol for r in the two equations.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top