Autonomous differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a differential equation modeling the volume of water in a conical pond, influenced by a constant inflow rate and evaporation proportional to the surface area. The derived equation is dV/dt = k - απ(3a/πh)^(2/3)V^(2/3), where α is the evaporation coefficient. The equilibrium depth of water is expressed as L = (h/a)√(k/(απ)), and it is established that this equilibrium is stable since the derivative of the right-hand side of the equation is negative at the equilibrium point. A condition for preventing overflow is that the equilibrium depth must not exceed the cone's depth, ensuring L ≤ h. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for managing water levels in the pond effectively.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
I just need some help with this problem. Thank you.

"A pond forms as water collects in a conical depression of radius a and depth h. Suppose that water flows in at a constant rate k and is lost through evaporation at a rate proportional to the surface area.

(a) Show that the volume V(t) of water in the pond at time t satisfies the differential equation

\frac{dV}{dt} = k - \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}

where \alpha is the coefficient of evaporation.

(b) Find the equilibrium depth of water in the pond. Is the equilibrium asymptotically stable?

(c) Find a condition that must be satisfied if the pond is not to overflow."

My work:

(a)

Consider the following

\frac{dV}{dt} = k - \alpha \pi \underbrace{\left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}} _{r^2}

where r is the radius of the pond. Thus, we have

r^2 = \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}

r^3 = \frac{3aV}{\pi h}

V = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 \left( \frac{hr}{a} \right) = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 L

which satisfies the differential equation.

(b)

\frac{dV}{dt} = 0

k - \alpha \pi r^2 = 0

r = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}

Then, the equilibrium depth of water in the pond is

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}

In this particular case, I don't know how to show whether or not it is asymptotically stable.

(c)

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}} \leq h


Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An equilibrium depth of water in the pond implies that there is an equilibrium volume. Thus, a direction field can show whether or not it is asymptotically stable, which is what I have at

http://mygraph.cjb.net/

Here are the (random) values that I used to plot it:

\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} k = 1 \\ \alpha = 0.6 \\ a = 0.3 \\ h = 0.5 \end{array} \right.

Based on this information, I'd say the equilibrium is asymptotically stable.

Thanks anyway
 
Thank you.



Great work so far! For part (b), we can determine the stability of the equilibrium by analyzing the sign of the derivative of the right-hand side of the differential equation at the equilibrium point. In this case, we have

\frac{d}{dV} \left( k - \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3} \right) = -\frac{2}{3} \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{-1/3}

Substituting in the equilibrium point r = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}, we get

\frac{d}{dV} \left( k - \alpha \pi r^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{3} \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} \left( \frac{k}{\alpha \pi} \right) ^{-1/3} = -2\left( \frac{a}{h} \right) ^{2/3}

Since \left( \frac{a}{h} \right) ^{2/3} is always positive, we can see that the derivative is always negative at the equilibrium point. This means that the equilibrium point is stable, but we cannot determine if it is asymptotically stable without further information about the initial conditions.

For part (c), you are correct in stating that the condition for the pond to not overflow is

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}} \leq h

This means that the equilibrium depth of water must be less than or equal to the depth of the cone. If the equilibrium depth is greater than the cone's depth, then the pond will overflow.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
903
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
921
Replies
4
Views
904
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
888
Back
Top