Symmetry Breaking: Unveiling the Mysteries of the Universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of symmetry breaking in physics, particularly in relation to the weak nuclear force and its implications for conservation laws. It addresses the idea that a 2% lack of symmetry in weak nuclear force reactions does not violate energy conservation or other physical laws, as this is linked to CP-violation rather than a fundamental breach of conservation principles. The conversation also explores whether the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) reflects a general principle of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the universe, concluding that while symmetry breaking affects particle proportions, it does not alter the fundamental laws of physics. The notion that the universe had no choice but to have its current laws is challenged, suggesting that this belief resembles a philosophical stance rather than a scientific conclusion. Overall, symmetry breaking is viewed as a useful framework for understanding physical models rather than a violation of established laws.
drag
Science Advisor
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1
Symmetry "breaking"

Greetings !

I'd like to ask and possibly discuss questions
about symmetry :
1. I heard that there is a 2% lacking symmetry in
weak nuclear force reactions. Does this
mean energy-conservation (and other physical laws)
are violated ?!
2. Does the HUP possibly represent the
general principle of sponteneous symmetry
"breaking" in the Universe ?
3. I've heard many scientists in the past
say things that eventually mean the following :
"The Universe had no choice but have the present
laws." However, wouldn't sponteneous symmetry
"breaking", if it takes place, violate that hypothesys ?

"Does dice play God ?"

Live long and prosper.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the symmetry breaking is the tool that says that the actual models which describe the states (e.g. the eightfold way) are good approximations, but that some quantities are not preserved. Thus the model does not exactly correspond to the symmetry of the system, since some restrictions to some substructure are not conserved. This is not very surprising, since the models are chosen to be manipulable. The symmetry breaking is then analyzed by the use of the branching rules, which allows you to see what actually happens. The fact that a lagrangian is not invariant by some subgroup is not telling you that convervation laws are violated.
 
1) No... they were probably talking about CP-violation, which is a different symmetry altogether.
2) I don't think so, but I'm not sure what the question means exactly.
3) Not really... the fundamental laws wouldn't be affected by the symmetry breaking, but things like the proportions of various particles existent would be. You should note that that statement is more like a religious belief, a faith that things aren't random, than a scientific position.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top