MHB 072 is Q(theta) a linear transformation from R^2 to itself.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
if $Q(\theta)$ is

$\left[\begin{array}{rr}
\cos{\theta}&- \sin{\theta}\\
\sin{\theta}&\cos{\theta}
\end{array}\right]$

how is $Q(\theta)$ is a linear transformation from R^2 to itself.

ok I really didn't know a proper answer to this question but presume we would need to look at the unit circle

not sure if this helps

Screenshot 2021-03-13 1.27.12 PM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok thanks
I usually don't get much replies on these linear algebra posts
 
karush said:
Ok thanks
I usually don't get much replies on these linear algebra posts

I'd help out, but it's been since my sophomore year in school (1973) since I've taken a course in Linear Algebra ... except for the very basic stuff, I haven't used it so I've "losed" it.
 
Better is to understand what "linear transformation" means! ANY transformation that can be written as a matrix multiplication is linear!

A transformation, L, on a vector space is "linear" if and only if
L(u+ v)= Lu+ Lv, for any vectors u and v, and
L(au)= aLu, for any vector u and scalar, a.

Here if $u= \begin{pmatrix}x \\ y \end{pmatrix}$ and $v= \begin{pmatrix} a \\ b\end{pmatrix}$, $L(u+ v)= \begin{pmatrix} cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x+ a \\ y+ b\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}(x+ a)cos(\theta)- (y+ b)sin(\theta) \\ (x+ a)sin(\theta)+ (y+ b)cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}$.

While $Lu+ Lv= \begin{pmatrix} cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y \end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix} cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} xcos(\theta)- ysin(\theta) \\ xsin(\theta)+ y cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix} acos(\theta)- bsin(\theta) \\ asin(\theta)+ bcos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}(x+ a)cos(\theta)- (y+ b)sin(\theta) \\ (x+ a)sin(\theta)+ (y+ b)cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}$.

And $L(au)= \begin{pmatrix} cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatri
https://mathhelpboards.com/forums/-/create-thread
072 is Q(theta) is a linear transformation from R^2 to itself.
  • Thread starterkarush
  • Start datehttps://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/
https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/#post-124753https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/watch
https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/post-124753
  • Thread starter
  • New
  • https://mathhelpboards.com/posts/124753/bookmark
  • https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/post-124753
https://mathhelpboards.com/data/avatars/s/0/55.jpg?1588030209
karush
Well-known member

Jan 31, 2012 2,838
if Q(θ)Q(θ) is

[cosθsinθ−sinθcosθ][cos⁡θ−sin⁡θsin⁡θcos⁡θ]

how is Q(θ)Q(θ) is a linear transformation from R^2 to itself.

ok I really didn't know a proper answer to this question but presume we would need to look at the unit circle

not sure if this helps
screenshot-2021-03-13-1-27-12-pm-png.gif


Last edited by a moderator: Today at 12:07 AM
https://mathhelpboards.com/posts/124753/react?reaction_id=1 https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/reply?quote=124753 https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/072-is-q-theta-is-a-linear-transformation-from-r-2-to-itself.28497/reply?quote=124753
https://mathhelpboards.com/posts/124753/report

x}ax \\ ay \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}ax coz
 
skeeter said:
I'd help out, but it's been since my sophomore year in school (1973) since I've taken a course in Linear Algebra ... except for the very basic stuff, I haven't used it so I've "losed" it.

wow... my senior year was 1970 but my highest level in math was algebra II which today is much more advanced
2021_03_07_16.48.50.jpg
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K