1-D (I think) Speed to distance problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnanimousto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
A runner accelerates from rest to 2.0 m/s over 12 m, and the problem asks for the distance needed to reach 3.0 m/s under the same force. The initial attempt to solve it using time was incorrect, leading to confusion. Participants suggest using kinematic equations or the Work-Energy Theorem to find acceleration first. Recognizing that the force remains constant implies the acceleration is the same for both scenarios is crucial. The correct total distance to accelerate to 3.0 m/s is determined to be 27 m.
magnanimousto
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A runner exerts a constant force to accelerate from rest to 2.0 m/s over a distance of 12 m.
Assuming the runner can keep up the same force, what total distance would be needed to ac-
celerate up from rest to 3.0 m/s?

Homework Equations



none given.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer to the problem is 27. After quite some time spent thinking I tried solving first part for time using x= 1/2 vt and then plugging it into 2nd part. but that gives time as 12 and 2nd x as 18 so wrong. Dunno how to solve it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
magnanimousto said:

Homework Statement



A runner exerts a constant force to accelerate from rest to 2.0 m/s over a distance of 12 m.
Assuming the runner can keep up the same force, what total distance would be needed to ac-
celerate up from rest to 3.0 m/s?

Homework Equations



none given.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer to the problem is 27. After quite some time spent thinking I tried solving first part for time using x= 1/2 vt and then plugging it into 2nd part. but that gives time as 12 and 2nd x as 18 so wrong. Dunno how to solve it
Hello magnanimousto. Welcome to PF!

What kinematic equations do you know?

Alternatively, do you know the Work-Energy Theorem ?
 
This is a constant acceleration problem, so you can use the basic kinematic equations for that case. Try solving for the acceleration first, and using that value for the next part.

If you don't know those equations, here's the one you should probably use -- they're very helpful to memorize though.
v_{f}^{2}= v_{i}^{2} + 2aΔd
 
Thanks jackarms & SammyS.I do know kinematics equations, for some reason it never occurred to me that since the force is the same in both so must be the acceleration
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top