1000Base-T vs 1000Base-X (Copper vs Fiber) design guidelines

  • Thread starter Thread starter crono1009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Fiber
AI Thread Summary
Designing a dual port 1000Base-T Gigabit Ethernet circuit card poses space challenges, prompting a shift to fiber-optic systems for smaller connectors. Transitioning from RJ45 MagJack to a fiber optic module requires ensuring compatibility with 1000BASE-X, potentially necessitating changes to RGMII and MAC interfaces. Board layouts for fiber differ from copper, primarily in connector size and signal integrity considerations. SFP transceivers are suggested as a compact solution, capable of replacing RJ45, magnetics, and PHY components. Resources and documentation on these design transitions are sought for further guidance.
crono1009
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm currently designing a dual port 1000Base-T Gigabit Ethernet circuit card. My problem is that I do not have much space to work with on my board and the dual port RJ45 Magjack is taking up a ton of space. To save space I've been looking to switch to a fiber-optic system with much smaller connectors.

Anyone have experience laying out a fiber design? Could I essentially just switch out my RJ45 MagJack with a fiber optic module and switch my PHY to one that supports 1000BASE-X? In other words would I have to change my current RGMII and MAC interfaces to support fiber?

How is a board layout with fiber different than with copper?

Any documents on these topics would be helpful, I'm having difficult finding them.

Thank you,
-Kevin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
While looking for space saving solutions for my gigabit ethernet board I found SFP transceivers. Does anyone have any experience with these? Can one 1000BASE-T SFP transceiver replace the RJ45, Magnetics, and PHY on my board?

Thanks,
-Kevin
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top