Solve Optics Problems: Goldfish Eye & Spherical Refraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter w2dot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving optics problems related to a goldfish's eye and spherical refraction. For the first problem, the apparent position and linear magnification of the goldfish's eye are calculated using the refractive index of water, with clarification on sign conventions and the treatment of refractive indices. The second problem involves determining the refractive index of glass based on the relationship between object and image distances, with emphasis on the correct application of optical formulas. Participants clarify the reasoning behind using specific values for refractive indices and the implications of ray direction on calculations. Overall, the thread provides insights into tackling optics problems with practical examples and equations.
w2dot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Problem 1

Homework Statement



A goldfish's eye is 4cm from the surface of a spherical goldfish bowl of radius 10cm. Neglecting the thickness of the glass, find the apparent position and linear magnification of the eye to an observer if the refractive index of the water is 1.333. (Hint: have the light traveling from left to right to meet the surface of the bowl)

From "Optics" 2nd edition 1996 by AH Tunnacliffe and JG Hirst. Pg 62, Question 20

Homework Equations



(1) Lreduced' - Lreduced = F

(2) Lreduced = n/l L'reduced=n'/l'

(3) h'/h = Lreduced/L'reduced

(4) (n'-n)/r = F

The Attempt at a Solution



Using (1) and (2)
n'/l' - 1/l = (1-1.333)/(-0.1)

L' - 1.333/(-0.04) = 3.33
L' = -29.95
l' = -0.03334m

Magnification
L/L' = (1.333/-0.04)/(-29.95) = 1.11

That gives me the right answers, but I'm really confused why that is.

Should I do this problem with r = +0.04 or -0.04?
Why, for L, would I treat n as 1 when it's on the side of the water?
Why doesn't n1/n2 = real depth/apparent depth work?

Problem 2

Homework Statement


A spherical refracting surface, separating air from glass, forms a real image twice the size of the real object. If the image is 6 times as far from F' as the object is from F', find the refractive index of the glass.

From same source as above but Q24

Homework Equations


xx' = ff'
h'/h = Lbar/Lbar'
F = -n/f
F = n'/f'
L' - L = F

The Attempt at a Solution



h' = 2h2h/h = Lbar/Lbar'
2 = Lbar/Lbar'

Lbar=1/l (because in air)
l = x+f

Lbar' = n'/l'
l' = 6x + f' (because image's x is 6x object's x)

2 = Lbar/Lbar'
2 = (1/(x+f))/(n'/(6x+f'))
2 = (6x + f')/((x + f)n')
2n'x + 2n'f = 6x + f'

This is where I wonder whether the f's are equal and if not, what they are. I've found introducing r from F=(n'-n)/r (as f = -n/F and f' = n'/f') makes it even more muddled

THANK YOU!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For your first question, you get the right answers because you did it right.
As for the sign convention, generally the direction of the ray of incident light is taken to be positive.

You do take n=1 for the outside because that's the refractive index of air. The bowl is kept in air, and the fish is in water, so n=1 for air and n=1.33 for water.

n2/n1 doesn't work because that is the condition for normal viewpoint. As the rays of light arent incident normally, this doesn't work. The process is the same.

L'/L works because that's approximately equal to the ratio of the height of the object to the height of the image. You can prove this using similar triangles. Its quite straightforward.
 
For your second question, l=x-f and l'=6x+f, and unless something else is given, I think you'll have to keep the answer in terms of the radius of curvature of the refracting surface.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top