1D Elastic Collisions with air gliders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a physics problem regarding elastic collisions between two air track gliders of different masses and speeds. The initial conditions specify a 300g glider moving at 50 cm/s and a 200g glider at 100 cm/s, with the goal of finding their velocities post-collision. The user has attempted to apply conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations but expresses uncertainty about their approach and the correctness of their calculations. Suggestions include using alternative algebraic methods, such as the difference of squares, to simplify the solution process. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in deriving the final velocities of both gliders after the elastic collision.
aeromat
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Q: Two air track gliders of masses 300g, and 200g move towards each other in opposite directions with speeds of 50cm/s and 100cm/s respectively. Take the direction of the more massive glider as positive.

If the collision is elastic, find the velocity of each glider AFTER collision

[Given answer for the question: [-70cm/s, 80cm/s], but I'm not sure if that is respective to the gliders themselves]


Let A be the 300g plane
Let B be the 200g plane

Homework Equations



[1]---> MAVA + MBVB = MAV'A + MBV'B
[2]---> 1/2MVA^2 + 1/2MVB^2 = 1/2MV'A^2 + 1/2MV'B^2

1/2's are canceled out, so we get:
[2] MVA^2 + MVB^2 = MV'A^2 + MV'B^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Isolated V'B in the momentum conservation equation to get the following:

V'B = \frac{MAVA + MBVB - MAV'A}{MB}
V'B = \frac{(300)(50) + (200)(-100) - 300(V'A)}{200}

Subbed into the kinetic energy conservation equation:

MAVA^2 + MBVB^2 = MAV'A^2 + MB(\frac{MAVA + MBVB - MAV'A}{MB})^2
Let V'A rep x
(300)(50)^2 + (200)(-100)^2 = (300)(x)^2 + 200(\frac{(300)(50) + (200)(-100) - 300(x)}{200})^2

At this step, I am doubting whether or not I should countinue doing it this way. Is there any other algebraic method to get the two velocities after the collision, being it an elastic collision? I carry out this entire question taking up about half a page and then find myself scratching my head over a wrong answer...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a much neater way of doing this! Try using the difference of 2 squares and dividing the KE conservation equation by the momentum conservation equation
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top