2 charges located in the x-y plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Londonfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Plane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the characteristics of two charges in the x-y plane, specifically charge q1 at the origin and charge q2 at (0.1, 0). The electric field at the point (0.03, 0.05) is entirely in the +y direction, indicating that q1 must be positive to achieve this effect. The calculations suggest that q2 is negative, but the derived magnitude of -29.9997 C appears excessively high, raising concerns about the accuracy of the calculations. The contributor expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks feedback on the problem-solving process. Clarification on the calculations and the implications of charge interactions is needed for a more accurate conclusion.
Londonfish
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider 2 charges located in the x-y plane; q1 of magnitude 5 mC (millicoulombs) is located at the origin, and q2 of unknown magnitude is located at (x,y) = (0.1, 0) (in metres). The electric field E at position (0.03, 0.05) is found to be entirely in the +y direction (i.e. the x-component is zero). Determine the sign of charge q1 and the magnitude and sign of charge q2.


Homework Equations



|q| = 5mC (microCoulombs)

F= qE ; q= charge, E= electric Field
E(r) = ƩEi(r)
=1/(4*pi*ε°)*Ʃ(r-ri)*qi/(r-ri)3


The Attempt at a Solution



E1(for one charge)= 1/(4*pi*ε°)*q1/r2
= 1/(4*pi*ε°)* (0.000005 C)/0.0015m
E= 2.996*107

Then I went and did,
E=1/(4*pi*ε°)[(q1/r2)+q2/(r-r2)2]
rearrange for q2 and,
q2= [E(4*pi*ε°)+(r2/q1)](r-r2)2
q2= -29.9997 C. (This seems way to high to be correct)

So q1 is positive to make E in the + y direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If q2 is negative, and q1 is positive, then at a location having it's x coordinate between that of the two charges, the electric field would definitely have a non-zero x component.
 
Thanks for that. What do you think of the other part of the problem? I'm not quite sure if I'm missing something or did something wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top