2 hanging masses with springs, find spring constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant for a system of two hanging masses connected by springs. The user initially applies Hooke's Law and equilibrium equations to analyze the forces acting on block A, leading to a calculated spring constant of 1.962 kN/m. After some clarification, it is confirmed that treating the masses as a combined object simplifies the analysis and yields the same result. The final equations derived from separate free-body diagrams for each block ultimately support the initial calculation. The problem-solving approach is validated, reinforcing the understanding of force interactions in the system.
Hyperfluxe
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/0gexJ.png

Homework Equations


F=kx (Hooke's Law), ƩFy=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a free-body diagram for each block. For block A, I get the equilibrium equation: Fa = (10kg)(9.81ms^-2) = 98.1N = kx_a
x_a = 300mm-250mm = 50mm
k = 1.962kN/m

For block B I get the equilibrium equation of Fb = 98.1 - Wa = kx_b but it seems as I don't need this equation.

Is this correct, and if not, should I draw a "combined" FBD? If so, how? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hyperfluxe said:
Is this correct, and if not, should I draw a "combined" FBD? If so, how?
Your equation is not obtained from analyzing block A alone, but by treating A and B as a combined object. So you answered your own question, even if you didn't realize it.

If you analyzed A alone, you'd have to include the force from each spring and only the weight of A.
 
Oh I see. From drawing separate FBD's, I get the equations:
kxa = kxb + mag (block A)
kxb = mbg (block B)
Substitute kxb back into the first equation to get kxa = (ma + mb)g, where xa = 300mm - 250mm, thus k = 1.962kN/m.

Is this correct? Thank you.
 
Perfectly correct. Note that your final equation is equivalent to what you did earlier.
 
Thank you for you time and help =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top