2 identical capacitors, given potential in joules

AI Thread Summary
Two identical capacitors, A and B, are connected in parallel after capacitor A is charged with 4J of energy while capacitor B remains uncharged. When connected, the total stored energy in the system becomes 2J due to the redistribution of charge. The confusion arises from the relationship between charge and capacitance, where the total charge remains constant but the effective capacitance doubles. The energy equation, U = q^2/2C, illustrates that halving the charge and doubling the capacitance results in the energy being halved. Understanding these principles clarifies how the energy changes when capacitors are connected in parallel.
jendead
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Capacitors A and B are identical. Capacitor A is charged so it stores 4J of energy and capacitor B is uncharged. The capacitors are then connected in parallel. The total stored energy in the capacitors is now ____.

Homework Equations


U = q^2/2C

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I'm not sure if this is allowed.. I already know the answer is 2J. My professor gave us an answer key with the problem done out, but I don't understand what is happening. I'm not sure where 2J went. It says 2J of energy were required to move charge from the charged capacitor to the uncharged one.

I know initial potential of A is 4J, and initial potential of B is 0. For final potential, she has U_final = q^2/2C = 1/2*q^2/2C. Where did the second 1/2 come from?

I would really appreciate some clarification.. I'm really confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the two capacitors are connected in parallel the capacitance doubles, while Q remains the same.
 
I understand that, but I don't see how that relates here. From the look of the answer key, I don't understand where total potential is halved when being spread out over 2 capacitors.
 
The potential is halved because the same charge is being spread out over two capacitors. What the relation between potential and charge for a capacitor?
 
It's U = q^2/2C.. so if I plug in (q/2)^2/2(2C), which is halving the charge and doubling the capacitance, I'd have q^2/16C.. which still makes no sense.

Am I missing something conceptually or algebraically?
 
The U in that equation is energy stored the capacitor, not potential between the plates (volts). Is that your problem?
 
Yes, I'm trying to find the potential energy (in joules), not the voltage. I may have been unclear when I said potential.
 
If you understand why capacitance doubles, then why can't you just change the C in Q^2/(2C) to 2C and conclude 4J changes to 2J?
 
Ok, that's starting to make sense.. but why isn't Q also changed to Q/2 since it's being halved at the same time?

I apologize for being so dense - I tend to have a really hard time with these concepts sometimes.
 
  • #10
Q is total Q, between both capacitors. Total charge doesn't change. C changes to C/2. It does change.
 
  • #11
Ok, that makes sense. Thank you for being patient. :)
 
Back
Top