2 particles in an infinite quantum well

Joqe
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If we have 2 particles in ground state in an infinite quantum well of length L (one-dimetion). Suppose then that the unperturbed energy is two times the ground energy of only one particle in an infinite qunatum well of length L.

Then I want to use first order perturbation theory to find the perturbed energy if the perturbation is A*d(x2-x1) (diracs-delta function), interaction between the particles or something, where A is a constant.

How do I construct the wave equation for this system en how do I calculate the perturbation?

I have tried with various linear combinations with no convincing success.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Joqe!

First of all you have to find the wave function of the two-particles system.
Do you know if there are identical or not? This condition and the spin of
each particle give it to you if the wave function will be symmetrical or
anti-symmetrical. Then you can use perturbation theory to found the value

<\Psi_{12}|A\delta(x_{1} - x_{2})|\Psi_{12}>
 
Hi criz.corral! Thank you for your kind answer.

Yes the particles are indeed identical and have spin 1/2.

As for the perturbation, a friend of mine suggested that I should ues degenerat perturbation theory, which I'm not familliar with and I don't see why I cannot use that you have suggested.

Later I'm supposed to answer why the anti-symmetrical wave functions doesn't give any shift of the energy. And what the total spin quantum numer S is.
 
Hi again Joqe:

Roughly speeking, first order degenerate perturbation theory diagonalizes
your Hamiltonian. The eigenfunctions are your correction to the wave
function and the eigenvalues to the energy. In this case you may use it,
because you have two different states with the same energy. Particle
1 on n_{1}=1 and spin "up" and particle 2 on n_{2}=1 and
spin "down". There are different states but with the same energy. But, if you
see, you doesn't have the problem, because you interaction is diagonal.
I think that you doesn't have any problem to calculate:

<\Psi_{12}|A\delta(x_{2}-x_{1})|\Psi_{12}>

for your energy shift

Now, we still have the wave function problem. How we found it?

If there are Fermions (half-integer spin) you know that the total wave function
have to be Anti-symetric. But, this gave us two system configuration.

\Psi_{n_{1},n_{2}}^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2}) = \Phi^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2})\chi^{S}(S_{1},S_{2})

or

\Psi_{n_{1},n_{2}}^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2}) = \Phi^{S}(x_{1},x_{2})\chi^{AS}(S_{1},S_{2})

Where \chi^{AS} is the triplet state for the two 1/2 spin particles
and \chi^{S} is the singlet state. And:

\Phi^{AS}\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_{n_{1}}(x_{1})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{2}) - \psi_{n_{1}}(x_{2})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{1}))

\Phi^{S}\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_{n_{1}}(x_{1})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{2}) + \psi_{n_{1}}(x_{2})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{1}))

Are the spatial part of your total wave function

The interaction potential A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1}) doesn't depends of the
spin part of the wave function. When you calculate:

<\Psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\Psi^{AS/S}> = <\psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\psi^{AS/S}><\chi^{AS/S}(S_{1},S_{2})|\chi^{AS/S}(S_{1},S_{2})> = <\psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\psi^{AS/S}>

Because the spin parts are orthogonal.

Note what happens when n_{1}=n_{2}=1 you only have \Phi^{S}
because the anti-symmetrical part annihilates. Then:

\Phi^{S}(x_{1},x_{2})=\frac{2}{L}Sin(\frac{\pi x_{1}}{L})Sin(\frac{\pi x_{2}}{L})


Sorry about my english, I'm still learning.

Cordially

Cristóbal.
 
Last edited:
Hi again criz.corral!

Thank you so much, I think you had a terrific answer and everything is sorted out in a sens. Still somethings to consider but I'm very pleased with your answer.

Thank you again.
Joqe
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top