2 suspended balls with charge q. find q

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kastner86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Charge
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two charged Styrofoam balls suspended by threads, with a given mass and separation distance. To find the charge q, the net forces acting on the balls must be analyzed, considering both vertical and horizontal components. The vertical force balance leads to the equation FTy = mg, while the horizontal force balance involves the electrostatic force equation FTx = k*q1*q2/d^2. By substituting these equations and solving for q, the charge can be determined. The approach discussed is valid and provides a clear path to the solution.
Kastner86
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two Styrofoam balls with the same mass m = 7E-8 kg and the same positive charge q are suspended from the same point by insulating threads of length L = 0.92 m. The separation of the balls is d = 0.024 m. What is the charge q?

I am unable to add a graphic at this time. But i understand this is a common electrophysics problem, i think the problem describes it pretty well.


Homework Equations



F = (k*q1*q2)/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



One thing I will do first is find the value "h", the vertical distance between 1/2d and the ceiling (essentially completing the triangle)

Well I wasn't exactly sure where to start, and that may be part of the problem, so here is the thought process, I hope you can follow.

I know Fnet = 0 Fy = 0 Fx = 0

I know to get q i need to find F from each charge.

(note: FTy represents the Tension Force from the string in the y direction.)

So Fy = -mg + FTy = 0 so mg = FTy

How do find FTy? I understand it is a component of FT. would it be FTy = FT x (h/L) ??

So Fy = -mg + FT x (h/L) and from this i could get FT? is that correct?

If this is correct, I can also find FTx.

FTx = FT x (1/2d)/L

And Fx should = (FT x (1/2d)/L) - (k*q1*q2)/d^2

Since Fx = 0 i can set the above equation to 0 and solve for q??

This is what I tried to do anyways, does this make sense?

Any input is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is correct.
FTy = mg.....(1)
FTx = k*q1*q2/d^2...(2)
Substitute the values of FTx and FTy, then divide eq.(1) by eq.(2). From that you get the value of q.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top