2-switch forward converter -- transformer reset question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the operation of a 2-switch forward converter with synchronous rectifiers, highlighting the importance of transformer reset during the off state. At a switching frequency of 200kHz and a primary voltage of up to 330V, the timing of synchronous rectifiers must account for the non-instantaneous turn on/off of primary FETs. The output inductor carries AC currents, and during low DC levels, some currents may enter the second quadrant, necessitating a brief overlap of synchronous FETs to prevent uncontrolled voltage spikes. The key concern is ensuring equal volt*seconds during both the D and 1-D states to guarantee transformer reset, with simulations indicating a lack of volt*second balance. The overlap of synchronous rectifier conduction must occur during the dead time of the 1-D state for effective transformer reset.
PMASwork
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Switching power converter question (FYI, this is a 2-switch forward with synchronous rectifiers on the secondary). Switching at 200kHz.

The transformer stores & transfers energy during the on state (the "D" state), and then must be reset during the off state ("1-D" state).

The primary voltage of the converter can be as high as 330V, so the primary FETs - even ones with a relatively low COSS - will, at this frequency, have a non-negligible slope to their VDS turnon & turnoff; thus the timing of the synchronous rectifiers must take into account the reality of the lack of near-instantaneous turn on/off of the primary FETs.

Recall that the output inductor is carrying AC currents, and if the DC level of the output current is low enough, some of the AC current in the inductor will be <0A ("second quadrant"). The synch FETs have to have a (small) time during the 1-D state when they are both on, in order to provide a path for these possible second quadrant currents (otherwise the output inductor current would have no where to go, and the switch node would then see a large, uncontrolled voltage spike). But this also has the effect of shorting the secondary side of the transformer, which isn't necessarily an issue during the 1-D state.

Now, the way you guarantee that the transformer resets is to make sure there are an equal amount of volt*seconds applied to the transformer in both the D and 1-D states.

So, here's the question: If the transformer is not completely reset before the small time during the 1-D state when the synchronous FETs simultaneously conduct, how can I convince myself that I am resetting the transformer?

From one point of view, you'd think that the short (well, two RDSon in series) on the secondary would reset the transformer for sure... but given that the transformer is inductive itself, its current can't instantaneously change from it's pre-short current to the short current... yet both of these currents are flowing in the same direction, so I think the polarity of the transformer secondary can't change during this event.

Any ideas?

Thanks. :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hmmm... a PSPICE run indicates I do not have volt*second balance in this case. This makes me think that the overlap in synchronous rectifier on times must occur during the "dead time" of the 1-D state, between the time when the transformer resets and the 1-D state ends.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
22K
Back
Top