2009 F=MA Exam #6 (Conceptual Velocity Question)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the speed of an object thrown at various angles and its speed at a constant height, concluding that the speed is independent of the launch angle. The correct equation derived from conservation of energy shows that the speed at height h depends solely on the initial speed and height, expressed as v² = v₀² - 2gh. Attempts to relate speed to angle using kinematics reveal that while individual components of velocity change with angle, the overall speed remains constant at a given height. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding both energy conservation and kinematic equations in solving such problems. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the speed at height h does not vary with the angle of launch.
SignaturePF
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is thrown with a fixed initial speed v0 at various angles α relative to the horizon. At some constant
height h above the launch point the speed v of the object is measured as a function of the initial angle α.
Which of the following best describes the dependence of v on α? (Assume that the height h is achieved, and
assume that there is no air resistance.)

The answer is that v is independent of alpha.

Homework Equations


v2 = (v_0cosθ)2 - 2gd
Δx = v_ocosθt

The Attempt at a Solution


Let the displacement be d, as mentioned in the problem.
Solving for v gives:
v = √(v_02cos2θ - 2gd)
It looks like the velocity depends on the angle θ, particularly as θ increases, the velocity at that point seems to decrease.

How/why is this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually the equation is:

v2 = v02 - 2gh

where v is the speed (magnitude of the velocity) at height h, and v0 is the initial speed (at height 0). As you can see, the speed at height h only depends on the initial speed and on the height reached. The individual components of the velocity don't enter into it.

This equation can be derived from the conservation of energy.

(KE + PE )before = (KE + PE)after

(1/2)mv02 + mg(0) = (1/2)mv2 + mgh

mv2 = mv02 + 2mgh

v2 = v02 - 2gh
 
Oh ok, thanks, so I messed up the equation.
 
If you want to show it using the kinematics equations and the individual components, pretending that you don't know about conservation of energy, it's only a couple of extra steps.

We always have:

##v^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2##, where these are the speeds at height h. Agreed?

In the x direction, there is no acceleration, so we have:

##v_x^2 = v_{x0}^2 = v_0^2 \cos^2 \alpha =~\textrm{const.}##

In the y-direction, we have a constant acceleration of -g, so we can use the kinematic equation

##v_y^2 = v_{y0}^2 -2gh = v_0^2\sin^2\alpha - 2gh##

Again, you can derive this equation purely from kinematics without appealing to conservation of energy if you don't want to. Just start with the other two kinematics equations ##v_y = v_{y0} - gt## and ##h = v_{y0}t - (1/2)gt^2##, and eliminate t.

So now, plugging in the expressions for ##v_x^2## and ##v_y^2## to the first equation, we get:

##v^2 = v_0^2 \cos^2 \alpha + v_0^2\sin^2\alpha - 2gh##
## = v_0^2(\cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha) - 2gh##
## = v_0^2 - 2gh##

Et voila!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top