Simple Magnetic Field Increase/Decrease question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between induced and applied magnetic fields in a conducting loop with counterclockwise current. Participants clarify that the problem is asking about the change in the applied magnetic field, represented by X's, rather than the induced magnetic field. Lenz's Law is highlighted, explaining that the induced magnetic field opposes changes in the applied field, which is changing over time according to Faraday's Law. The induced magnetic field points out of the page, indicating that the applied magnetic field must be decreasing. Ultimately, the discussion concludes with a clearer understanding of these concepts and the correct answer to the problem.
Metalsonic75
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
33.6 There is a ccw-induced current in the conducting loop shown in the figure. Is the magnetic field inside the loop increasing in strength, decreasing in strength, or steady?

knight_Figure_33_06.jpg


I don’t understand if the problem is referring to the induced magnetic field or the pre-existing magnetic field. I know that the induced field will increase, but I’m pretty sure the original electric field remains steady. Which one is the problem asking for?

I appreciate your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is asking if the applied magnetic field, the field represented by the X's, is increasing or decreasing. You'll need to use Lenz's Law and the right hand rule for current and magnetic fields to solve this. Does that help?
 
So, the x's in the picture represent the original magnetic field, right? I assume that means the induced magnetic field (which should point out of the page) is not shown.

Lenz's law says that the induced magnetic field changes in response to an induced current. I don't understand how the induced magnetic field and the original magnetic field are related.

My textbook says that for a loop with a counterclockwise current and an applied magnetic field pointing into the page, the induced magnetic field will point out of the page, and it says that the "induced field is increasing." I am not seeing any information regarding how the applied field is affected by the introduction of a current, leading me to believe it is not affected and does not change.
 
Ok, you've made some good observations but let's be very clear about what's going on here. There is a current I in the wire loop. This is an induced current caused by the applied magnetic field. The applied magnetic field changes with respect to time (we know this by Faraday's Law). We want to know if this magnetic field is changing positively or negatively, that is, is \Delta B positive or negative.

Lenz's Law tells us that the induced magnetic field, that is, the magnetic field caused by the induced current, will act to oppose the change in the applied magnetic field. You've already mentioned that the induced magnetic field points out of the page inside the loop, so which direction must the change in the applied magnetic field point? And subsequently, does this constitute an increase or decrease in the applied field?
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much. I now understand the concepts of Lenz's law and magnetic fields much better, and I was able to obtain the correct answer. :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top