2D delta function fourier transform

quasartek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given f(x,y) = DeltaFunction(y - x*tan(theta))

a) Plot function.
b) Take Fourier transform.
c) Plot resulting transform.


Homework Equations


Delta function condition non-zero condition DeltaFunction(0) = Infinity
Sifting property of delta functions


The Attempt at a Solution


I am using Mathematica and can plot a 1D version, DeltaFunction(x), however, I am having trouble extending it to 2D for part a. Part b, I tried using the sifting property integral(deltafunction(y-x*tan(theta))*f(x,y)=f(y-tan(theta)) but could not progress after that point.

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that one of the defining properties of the delta function is that
\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)\delta(x)\,dx=f(0)​
for sufficiently chosen functions f. Using http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FubiniTheorem.html" , you can show that this is also true for double integrals.

Can you think of a way you might use this to find your Fourier transform?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I now tried to incorporate that property and Fubini's theorem
where

DoubleIntegral[ f(x,y)*Delta(y - x*tan(theta)), x,y,-Inf,Inf] = f(0,0) and plugging f(0,0) into Delta(0-0) gives Delta(0,0) which is Infinity. The Fourier Transform of that is 1?
 
quasartek said:
I now tried to incorporate that property and Fubini's theorem
where

DoubleIntegral[ f(x,y)*Delta(y - x*tan(theta)), x,y,-Inf,Inf] = f(0,0)

No,
\iint_{\mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)\delta(y-x\tan\theta)\,dA​
equals the sum of all the f(x,y)'s with y-x\tan\theta=0. Try expressing that as a (single) integral.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top