Programs 2nd year math major with a lackluster performance in Physics I & II

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in Physics II, particularly regarding grading and the effectiveness of instruction. The individual expresses frustration over receiving grades that do not reflect their understanding, noting that the instructor's grading system involves significant curves that inflate scores. Despite achieving a B in both Physics I and II, there is a concern that this does not accurately represent their grasp of the material, especially given the instructor's inexperience and the perceived difficulty of the tests. The individual feels that their experience in these courses may hinder future opportunities in physics-related fields, despite being a math major who may not need physics again. Others in the discussion suggest that introductory physics often lacks depth, emphasizing the importance of advanced courses that build on foundational knowledge and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the subject. Recommendations include pursuing further studies in advanced physics topics to gain a stronger grasp of the material.
triceryclops
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm just wrapping up my last semester at community college before heading to university, and while I'm likely to get A's in Calc 3, O.D.E. and Prob/Stats, this will not be the case in Physics II. I had the same instructor for both courses, each time was his first time teaching that course (he just recently obtained his master's).

I had a B in Physics I and will likely end up with a B in Physics II, but I don't feel like this accurately reflects my knowledge of the material. Firstly, every test has a huge curve, (halve your score, add 50). My raw score tends to be anywhere between an F and a B, but I always end with at least a C.

I've let the instructor know about my concerns and he's always had encouraging words, but I don't know if he's blowing smoke. He says it's a crash course in Mechanics, Waves, Electromagnetism, Thermodynamics, Optics and that most people miss a significant amount of material on their way through, including physics majors, but I'm not convinced. Other instructors have told me that his tests were way too difficult. Again, not convinced.

I know that as a math major, I will probably never have to take a physics course ever again in my life. But I feel like I wasted two whole semesters with this and I got a fraudulent grade, and that if I want to do anything with physics applications with a B.S. or higher, I've already missed that opportunity.

Anybody here ever been in a similar situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intro Physics is a crash course where you have to memorize formulas that work under specific conditions while at the same gaining a rough idea of how physics works. Later in upper level courses they start from first principles and derive these special case formulas and so you really begin to understand the physics.

Prof Richard Mueller has a book and a course on Physics entitled Physics for Future Presidents that kind of sums up Introductory Physics in a nutshell:

http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/pffp.html

So don't despair take some more advanced courses if you're interested in it like CM, EM, and QM. The math will be much heavier and perhaps more interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top