350 Hz sound travels through air and metal pipe at different speeds.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a circular fence based on the time difference in sound reaching an observer from a hammer strike. The sound frequency is 350 Hz, with speeds of 330 m/s in air and 1310 m/s in a metal pipe. The key realization is that the sound travels different paths: one through air and one through the pipe, leading to a time difference of 0.30 seconds. By applying the formula for velocity as displacement over time, the correct radius was determined to be approximately 81.9 m. The wavelength was deemed irrelevant to the solution, which focused on the displacement and time relationship.
KineticNRG
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I stumbled on this question while studying sound waves today, and it has got me stumped. I've been thinking this through for hours, to no avail. It goes: A park has a circular fence with a metal pipe as the top rail. If the fence is hit with a hammer it produces a sound of 350 Hz. At a point directly opposite the sound is heard twice at 0.30 seconds apart. If the speed of sound in air is 330 m/s and 1310 m/s in the metal pipe, then what is the radius of the fence?

I have used the formula Velocity = Frequency/Wavelength to determine the Wavelength of the sound in air (0.94 m) and in the pipe (3.74 m), but after that I'm stuck. My book gives the answer as 82 m, but no working is shown to help me understand why. I know that the sound will reach the other side via the air first, and can work out how far the sound will travel through the pipe in 0.3 seconds, but don't know how to calculate the total distance (circumference) or the diameter of the circular fence. Arrrgh, my brain hurts!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KineticNRG said:
I stumbled on this question while studying sound waves today, and it has got me stumped. I've been thinking this through for hours, to no avail. It goes: A park has a circular fence with a metal pipe as the top rail. If the fence is hit with a hammer it produces a sound of 350 Hz. At a point directly opposite the sound is heard twice at 0.30 seconds apart. If the speed of sound in air is 330 m/s and 1310 m/s in the metal pipe, then what is the radius of the fence?

I have used the formula Velocity = Frequency/Wavelength to determine the Wavelength of the sound in air (0.94 m) and in the pipe (3.74 m), but after that I'm stuck. My book gives the answer as 82 m, but no working is shown to help me understand why. I know that the sound will reach the other side via the air first, and can work out how far the sound will travel through the pipe in 0.3 seconds, but don't know how to calculate the total distance (circumference) or the diameter of the circular fence. Arrrgh, my brain hurts!

I believe the wavelength is irrelevant. The relevant piece that you may be missing is that the sound in the pipe travels to the observer by a different path than the sound in the air... Can you identify the two paths? What things are different about the two paths?
 
Yes, the wavelength was irrelevant. It was in the question just to trick us! It turned out that this is a velocity = displacement/time problem. I used that formula for the metal pipe, using pi*Radius as displacement. So the rearranged formula is Time = pi*Radius/Velocity. Due to time and radius being unknowns, I used the same formula with the displacement for the sound in air as 2*Radius. ie: Velocity = 2*Radius/Time+0.3 .By solving these simultaneously I got the correct answer of 81.9m. Thanks for the reply, otherwise I'd probably still be trying to figure out the relevance of the sound being 350 Hz.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top