Rotational kinetic energy versus translation kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding the distribution of energy in collisions involving rotational and translational kinetic energy is complex. It requires applying the principles of conservation of momentum and angular momentum. Additionally, experimental data is often needed to determine how much mechanical energy is lost during the collision. There is no simple formula for calculating the energy distribution between rotational and translational forms. This topic highlights the intricacies of physics mechanics that may not be covered in introductory courses.
Stucky
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I don't remember learning this in my C Physics Mechanics class which is odd since it seems pretty important. In the case where you have one object colliding with another object off its center of mass, how do you tell how much of the energy from the collision goes into rotational kinetic energy and how much of it goes into translational kinetic energy?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Stucky! Welcome to PF! :wink:

There's no straightforward method.

You work it out from the conservation of momentum and of angular momentum , together with some loss-of-energy equation determined by experiment, that usually gives the mechanical energy lost as a proportion of total mechanical energy. :smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top