3D Schrodinger Equation of a Wire for Energy Levels - Quantum Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the energy levels of electrons in a wire can be approximated by those of a one-dimensional box when the wire's length significantly exceeds its cross-sectional dimensions. The relevant equations for energy levels in both a 3D box and a 1D box are provided, highlighting the relationship between the dimensions and energy states. The participant expresses confusion about how to mathematically simplify the energy equation for the wire, particularly regarding the dominance of the b dimension when a is much larger. They seek clarification on calculating energy levels for specific quantum numbers, suggesting that the results should be similar for both systems. The conversation emphasizes the transition from a 3D to a 1D framework in quantum mechanics for elongated structures.
Doopdedoop
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a wire with length a and square base b x b (where a >> b), show that the first 1700 (approximately) levels of the electron in the wire are identical for the one dimensional box, when a = 1m and b = 1mm.



Homework Equations



I know that the allowed energies of a mass M in a 3D rectangular rigid box with sides a, b, and c are:

E1 = ħ^2 * (Pi)^2 / 2M * (nx^2 / a^2 + ny^2 / b^2 + nz^2 / c^2)

The energy of a 1-D box with length a is similar, being

E2 = ħ^2 * (Pi)^2 / 2M * (n^2 / a^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



For the purpose of this problem the energy of my wire is:

E = ħ^2 * (Pi)^2 / 2M * (nx^2 / a^2 + ny^2 / b^2 + nz^2 / b^2)

Now, I know by inspection and common sense that a long and very thing wire can be considered as a one dimensional system, which is used by the 1D Schrodinger equation.

The problem is that I'm not quite sure how it works out mathematically. If a >> b, then doesn't this mean we generally ignore the a component of E1, since the b part basically dominates the energy? But all the same, you can't do that for the equation for the 1D box.

It's all just a bit confusing for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming your formula for E is correct calculate the energy level for

nx, ny, nz = 1700, 1, 1 and nx, ny, nz = 1, 2, 1

they should be roughly equal?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top