$500 Superconductor research project?

AI Thread Summary
A university is offering $500 mini grants for undergraduate research, and a student is interested in superconductor research projects. However, there are concerns about the feasibility of conducting such research within this budget due to the high costs associated with necessary materials like liquid helium and cryostats. While some argue that liquid nitrogen is relatively affordable, the required equipment for superconductivity experiments remains prohibitively expensive. The consensus suggests that meaningful superconductor research cannot be realistically pursued with the limited funding available. Overall, the project may not be viable given the financial constraints.
Mo777
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello my university is giving out little "mini" grants for undergrad research and I was wanting to get involved because it sounds fun/looks good on a resume. The winners would get $500 to spend on a research project of their choosing. All I have to do to enter is fill out some paperwork stating my goals, and give a detailed budget on the project. I am an engineering physics/physics double major and am very interested in superconductor research. Does anyone know some projects that would be possible with that budget? If there are any that is.

Thank you so much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that a research project about superconductivity is not feasible with a 500$ budget. It is due to the fact that achieving the superconducting state requires liquid helium or liquid nitrogen (if you work with cuprates). These two materials are both expensive: so I think there's no chance. I am sorry for you!
 
Liquid nitrogen is expensive? At our dept at least, a gallon of LN2 is cheaper than a gallon of milk.
 
At my department liquid nitrogen free. The point is that if you want to use it, you need the transfer line and the cryostat: these are really expensive! A cryostat's price lies in the range between 10000-40000 € more or less.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top