What is the Difference Between Escape Velocity and Orbit Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Badger01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Escape Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Escape velocity is the speed needed for an object to break free from a planet's gravitational pull, calculated using the equation GMm/r = 1/2 mv². In contrast, orbital velocity refers to the speed required for an object to maintain a stable circular orbit around the planet, which is derived from the centripetal force equation F = mv²/r. The confusion arises in distinguishing these two velocities, as escape velocity is greater than orbital velocity. Specifically, escape velocity applies to an object leaving the planet's surface, while orbital velocity pertains to an object in a circular path at a given radius. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of motion in gravitational fields.
Badger01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
"Given a planet has mass M and radius R, find the speed it would have to be launched at. Compare this to the speed required to put the object in the circular orbit."

I understand the first half where Ep=Ek
i.e: GMm/r = 1/2 mv2
rearrange to find v

how ever, I'm unsure of what exactly the 'orbit velocity' is.
is the the value of v in centripetal force, F = mv2/r
is this the same as the speed needed to launch it into orbit or what? i am rather stumped here..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is a bit confusing. I suppose it could be asking you to compare the escape velocity for an object leaving the planet's surface (planet radius R) to the velocity of a hypothetical object orbiting the planet at the planet's surface. Obviously one would have to ignore the problem of terrain variations, such as mountains!

To answer your query, yes, the orbital velocity is the speed of the object along its orbital path. So it is indeed the 'v' in mv2/r.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top