6 Transistors: Why More is Better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandy.bridge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the necessity of using six transistors in a circuit design, emphasizing that four transistors may not suffice due to output limitations when handling two LOW signals simultaneously. It explains that NMOS devices cannot effectively pull the output high when both inputs are at Vdd, as they turn off before reaching the required voltage level. The body effect exacerbates this issue, preventing the output from achieving sufficient voltage, which can negatively impact subsequent circuit stages. The conversation underscores the importance of proper transistor configuration to ensure reliable signal integrity. Ultimately, the design must account for these electrical characteristics to function correctly.
sandy.bridge
Messages
797
Reaction score
1
Why is it required to have 6 transistors? Can it not have 4? Can the output not receive two LOW signals at once? Or does it have something to do with superposition such that upon adding the two signals it may enter the noise margin?
Here, I added a photo.
 

Attachments

  • CCI03022012_00000.jpg
    CCI03022012_00000.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 487
Engineering news on Phys.org
The circuit you've drawn in the bottom doesn't work. You can't use NMOS devices to pull up (and PMOS devices to pull down) in this way, because the devices will turn off before they pull up (or down) all of the way. Suppose your a and b are at Vdd. When those two NMOS devices try to pull up the output it will stop at <Vdd-2*Vt, because the NMOS devices turn off. In practice, what's called the body effect will make it even worse. If Vdd=5V, for example, the output probably won't pull up much past ~3V. Then if you feed this into the next gate of the system, the next NMOS devices have a lower voltage on their gates so the output pulls up less. Bottom line - it doesn't work this way.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top