Interpreting microcanonical distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the microcanonical distribution for a particle in a Coulomb potential. The expression ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = δ(E_0 - (1/2)m^{-1}p^2 - Zr^{-1}) indicates that the probability distribution is non-zero only on the constant energy surface defined by E_0. The delta function signifies that the distribution vanishes off this surface, confirming that if E_0 does not equal the energy expression, then ρ_{E_0} is zero. Additionally, the complete expression should include the phase space volume, represented as ρ = δ(E - E_0)/Ω_{E_0}, which reflects that all accessible microstates have equal probability at equilibrium. This clarification enhances the understanding of the microcanonical ensemble's properties.
jjr
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to interpret the expression of a microcanonical distribution for energy E_0 of a particle of mass m moving about a fixed centre to which it is attracted by a Coulomb potential, Zr^{-1}, where Z is negative. The function expression looks like this:

ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = \delta(E_0 - \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2-Zr^{-1}).

Most of the stuff in the expression is understandable, but I am not sure what the delta signifies here. Any help?

Thanks!
J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the microcanonical ensemble the system lies on a surface of constant energy in phase space so the probability distribution has to vanish off of the constant energy surface. The argument in the delta function just represents this surface.
 
So E_0 ≠ \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2+Zr^{-1} → ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = 0 ?

Does the original expression actually say something about the distribution itself, or only about this property?
 
jjr said:
So E_0 ≠ \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2+Zr^{-1} → ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = 0 ?

Yes.

jjr said:
Does the original expression actually say something about the distribution itself, or only about this property?

Well what you originally wrote down is not complete. It should be ##\rho = \frac{\delta(E - E_0)}{\Omega_{E_0}}## where ##\Omega_{E_0}## is the phase space volume accessible to the microstates. This simply says that at equilibrium the probability of the system being found in any of the accessible microstates is the same for all microstates.
 
Great! Thanks for helping me out
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top