A basic Theory Question (Electric Field Mapping)

AI Thread Summary
Reversing the polarities of electrodes during electric field mapping produces results that appear the same on paper, as the path of the electric field is simply inverted. The fundamental characteristics of the electric field remain unchanged, making it difficult to distinguish whether the field is directed towards or away from the electrodes. This concept is crucial for understanding the theoretical aspects of electric field mapping. Exploring these principles can enhance comprehension of electric fields in various applications. Overall, the theory behind electric field mapping emphasizes the consistency of results despite polarity changes.
smashbrohamme
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
If you reverse the polarities of the electrodes when you are "electric field mapping", wouldn't it show the same results on paper?
Just the path it takes is reversed, but you would never know the difference wether it's going away or towards correct?

I am diving into this "Electrical Field Mapping" and I am trying to dig into the theory more.

Any help would be appreciative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi smashbrohamme! :wink:
smashbrohamme said:
If you reverse the polarities of the electrodes when you are "electric field mapping", wouldn't it show the same results on paper?

yes :smile:
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Confused about direction of electric field
Replies
7
Views
3K
Calculating eletric potential using line integral of electric field
Replies
1
Views
2K
Finding the position where the electric field is zero
Replies
2
Views
1K
Electric field in a rotating rod in a magnetic field
Replies
3
Views
2K
Electric Field as a function of r, evaluating bounds
Replies
4
Views
1K
What is the electric field inside an infinite cylinder?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Why Is Work Positive When Done Against the Electric Field?
Replies
22
Views
3K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
Electric Field Mapping Lab. Qualitative questions.
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Thought I Understood Gauss' Law (Sheets)
Replies
26
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top