A circuit of four elements. Which are in series and which are in parallel?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying which elements in a provided circuit diagram are in series and which are in parallel. The original poster believes that all elements are in parallel, as indicated by their reshaped diagram. They express uncertainty about this interpretation, noting that it seems unconventional. Other participants agree, suggesting that the circuit's configuration indeed lacks any series connections due to the short circuit path. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately analyzing circuit layouts for proper classification.
siylence
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I basically have this diagram:
[PLAIN]http://www.tinyimg.org/images/595physic144.png

The problem asks "which of the elements are in series and which of the elements are in parallel?"

I WANT to say that they are ALL in parallel with each other and none are in series, but I've never seen anything like that before. I tried re-shaping the diagram and I got this:

[PLAIN]http://www.tinyimg.org/images/550physic144attempt.png

Am I wrong about this, because that looks like they're all in parallel to me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
siylence said:
I basically have this diagram:
[PLAIN]http://www.tinyimg.org/images/595physic144.png

The problem asks "which of the elements are in series and which of the elements are in parallel?"

I WANT to say that they are ALL in parallel with each other and none are in series, but I've never seen anything like that before. I tried re-shaping the diagram and I got this:

[PLAIN]http://www.tinyimg.org/images/550physic144attempt.png

Am I wrong about this, because that looks like they're all in parallel to me?

That's the answer I would give. The short circuit path around the outside pretty much removes and "series" paths that I can see.

Welcome to the PF, BTW.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's what I was thinking.

And thank you, I plan on being active in the forums.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top