A clarification in linear algebra

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a question in linear algebra concerning the determination of whether a specific subset of R^3 is a subspace. The subset is defined by the elements of the form (s-2t, s, t+s) where s and t are real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of subspaces by discussing closure under addition and scalar multiplication. Some suggest that the elements can be expressed as linear combinations of two vectors, while others propose considering mappings from R^2 to R^3. Questions arise regarding relevant theorems and the implications of linear independence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on the problem. Some have provided insights into the structure of the subset and its relationship to vector spaces, while others seek clarification on specific points and theorems relevant to the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the need to prove closure properties and discuss the implications of linear independence in the context of vector spaces. There is mention of potential gaps in understanding due to varying levels of familiarity with the material.

ehabmozart
Messages
212
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a general question in linear algebra

Determine whether the following subset of R^3 is a subspace

The elements go vertically but I can't show them in this way and will show them horizontally however.

( s-2t, s, t+s ) / s, t ε R ...

Homework Equations



The book attempt to show closure under addition and multiplication

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it possible to use another argument. I claim that these three elements can be divided into two vectors which are also subsets of R-3 ... They are the span of (1,1,1)(-2,0,1).. Since they are lin. independent, they are vector spaces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ehabmozart! :wink:
ehabmozart said:
I claim that these three elements can be divided into two vectors which are also subsets of R-3 ... They are the span of (1,1,1)(-2,0,1).. Since they are lin. independent, they are vector spaces?

you're saying that anything of the form ( s-2t, s, t+s ) is s(1,1,1) + t(-2,0,1) and vice versa

so yes, if you've already proved the relevant theorems (which if you're still on page 1 of the chapter, you haven't!), that does immediately prove they are a vector subspace :smile:
 
Hi, you might want to think about it this way:

Suppose you have the set:

[itex](a_1s + b_1t, a_2s + b_2t, a_3s + b_3t): s, t \in R[/itex]

Where the a's and b's are any constants. Is this set a subspace? Try showing closure under addition and scalar multiplication.

Then, you might want to consider a mapping, L, from [itex]R^2 to R^3[/itex]

[itex]L(s, t) = (a_1s + b_1t, a_2s + b_2t, a_3s + b_3t)[/itex]

Then, you might want to consider what sort of mapping this is and how L could be represented.

Then, you might look at your original problem in new light.

Interesting? Or, not?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi ehabmozart! :wink:


you're saying that anything of the form ( s-2t, s, t+s ) is s(1,1,1) + t(-2,0,1) and vice versa

so yes, if you've already proved the relevant theorems (which if you're still on page 1 of the chapter, you haven't!), that does immediately prove they are a vector subspace :smile:

Excuse me, what are the relevant theorems you are talking about?
 
PeroK said:
Hi, you might want to think about it this way:

Suppose you have the set:

[itex](a_1s + b_1t, a_2s + b_2t, a_3s + b_3t): s, t \in R[/itex]

Where the a's and b's are any constants. Is this set a subspace? Try showing closure under addition and scalar multiplication.

Then, you might want to consider a mapping, L, from [itex]R^2 to R^3[/itex]

[itex]L(s, t) = (a_1s + b_1t, a_2s + b_2t, a_3s + b_3t)[/itex]

Then, you might want to consider what sort of mapping this is and how L could be represented.

Then, you might look at your original problem in new light.

Interesting? Or, not?

I am sorry but I don't your point here... Please clarify!
 
I assume you've done matrices? If so, you might notice that the original set can be seen as the action of the matrix:

[itex]\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1&-2\\<br /> 1&0\\ <br /> 1&1\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

On vectors (s, t). And, those columns should look familiar!
 
Last edited:
ehabmozart said:
Excuse me, what are the relevant theorems you are talking about?

direct sum of two linear spaces is a linear space?
 
ehabmozart said:

Homework Statement



This is a general question in linear algebra

Determine whether the following subset of R^3 is a subspace

The elements go vertically but I can't show them in this way and will show them horizontally however.

( s-2t, s, t+s ) / s, t ε R ...

Homework Equations



The book attempt to show closure under addition and multiplication

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it possible to use another argument. I claim that these three elements can be divided into two vectors which are also subsets of R-3 ... They are the span of (1,1,1)(-2,0,1).. Since they are lin. independent, they are vector spaces?
Yes. What your are saying is the set of all vectors of the form (s- 2t, s, t+s)= s(1, 1, 1)+ t(-2, 0, 1) is the span of vectors (1, 1, 1) and (-2, 0, 1) and so is a vector space.

(The span of any set of vectors is a vector space. The fact that those two vectors are independent tells you that this is a two dimensional subspace of [itex]R^3[/itex] and that {(1, 1, 1) (-2, 0, 1)} is a basis.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K