A couple questions regarding pressure drop

AI Thread Summary
Head loss and pressure drop are often used interchangeably, but they represent different concepts; head loss is typically expressed in units of length, while pressure drop is in force per area. The Darcy-Weisbach equation relates head loss to friction in a fluid flow, and can be transformed into an equation for pressure drop, but dimensional consistency is crucial. The friction factor for turbulent flow can be approximated using a specific formula, but discrepancies in dimensional correctness may arise from incorrect assumptions or simplifications. Changes in height affect pressure drop due to gravitational influences, which can complicate the relationship between head loss and pressure drop in practical applications. Understanding these distinctions is essential for accurate calculations in fluid dynamics.
kosig
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
First, I am very confused as to the difference, if any, between head loss and pressure drop/loss. Can someone help me?

Also, I know that the Darcy-Weisbach equation for head loss due to friction is hf=fL/D*V2/2g

and you can plug that into get an equation for delta p that is
dp=fL/D*pV2/2

And this is dimensionally correct. My company says that for our applications all flow will be turbulent Re>4000 and the equation for the friction factor can be approximated to
f=(.0337*v.25)/(V.25*d.25) Which I am assuming is from the Colebrook equation.

So my problem is, when I plug this into the equation for delta p I get an equation which is not dimensionally correct. Why? And what does it mean?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They are often times used somewhat interchangably. Head typically has units of length, while pressure has the typical force/area units. The terminology probably comes from the Bernoulli Equation, we can be written such that each term has units of pressure
<br /> p + \rho\frac{V^2}{2} + \rho g z = C<br />
or of units of length:
<br /> \frac{p}{\rho g} + \frac{V^2}{2g} + z = C<br />
You'll find that often times in pipe flow or industries such as that, you'll find pumps and suchs in terms of head.

As far as what they physically mean, they are essentially the same thing, one divided by specific weight.
 
Alright that makes sense. What effect does a change in height have on pressure drop? For instance, I have a tube that is carrying a fluid and the tube starts at a pump and connects at a filter below. The tube has a large radius bend.
 
what is the diffrance between pressure drop and head loss,exactly?thanhs
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top