A decent k value for Newton's law of cooling for water?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining a suitable "k" value for Newton's law of cooling specifically for water, with a focus on practical applications involving cooling water from boiling to a desired temperature. Participants explore the assumptions and conditions necessary for accurate calculations, including the geometry of the water and the thermal conditions at its boundaries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a "k" value for cooling water, assuming a floating cube of water with minimal insulation.
  • Another participant suggests that calculating temperature and time accurately requires solving a partial differential equation (PDE) and emphasizes the importance of environmental factors.
  • A different participant offers to provide values if more assumptions are clarified.
  • Questions are raised about the specific geometry and thermal conditions of the water, such as whether the surfaces are insulated or at constant temperature.
  • A participant describes the water as a floating cube and proposes various boundary conditions, including a scenario where five sides are insulated and one side is at ambient temperature.
  • Further elaboration on the cooling scenario includes considerations of the shape of the water (cube vs. sphere) and the impact of natural convection on heat transfer rates.
  • A mathematical formulation is provided for calculating the heat transfer coefficient and a heat balance equation for the cooling process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions needed for calculations, the geometry of the water, and the significance of environmental conditions. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to determine the "k" value or the specific conditions required for accurate modeling.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clear assumptions regarding the geometry and thermal conditions, as well as the potential complexity of solving the relevant equations. The discussion reflects various interpretations of the cooling scenario and the factors influencing heat transfer.

Chernoobyl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A decent "k" value for Newton's law of cooling for water?

Recently I've been trying to cool some water to a specific temperature from boiling. It doesn't have to be super accurate (within about 5° degrees Fahrenheit or 2° Celsius) but the only thermometer I have access to is just for ambient temperature, and I'm not about to dunk that thing in boiling water until the temperature drops ~30 degrees. So what I need is a k value I can use for water so I can be relatively close to my desired temperature.

What I'm assuming is that I have a magical floating cube of water where the only insulation is from the water its self. I'd also like to be able to make the constant based on various volumes of water so if that could be kept as a variable, V, that would make it much easier for me for when I plug this whole thing into excel.

It's been quite a while since I've had anything I could consider a thermodynamics class so forgive me if I'm a little slow on picking up what you're putting down (don't you love the dated phraseology?). Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the information you have, you will not be able to calculate a time or temperature. Your best bet it to do trials. To get temperature and time requires solution of a PDE, and you need good knowledge of the energy exchange. The environment is as critical in determining the final temperature as the properties of the water.
 
Well I can make more assumptions, tell me what I need to assume and I can give values.
 
What is the specific geometry you are interested in, and what are the thermal conditions applied at the boundary(ies)? For example, constant temperature surface, insulated surface, specified heat flux surface, etc. What are the physical dimensions? These are all considerations needed to arrive at your answer.
 
Well the water is a magical floating cube so that means the dimensions are ³√V for all sides and I'll assume it is a constant temperature surface at the ambient temperature of the room on all 6 sides... however, it doesn't seem that accurate so if it isn't too much of a bear to solve for let's make it so 5 of the 6 sides are perfectly insulated and the remaining side is the only one with the constant temperature surface (although both will probably get me close enough).
 
Chernoobyl said:
Well the water is a magical floating cube so that means the dimensions are ³√V for all sides and I'll assume it is a constant temperature surface at the ambient temperature of the room on all 6 sides... however, it doesn't seem that accurate so if it isn't too much of a bear to solve for let's make it so 5 of the 6 sides are perfectly insulated and the remaining side is the only one with the constant temperature surface (although both will probably get me close enough).
So let me get this straight. You have a glob of water which is somehow levitated in the air in the room (say glob and the room are in free fall). You are assuming that the glob is cubical, but I'm guessing a spherical shape would be just as good as a cube. Typically, the main resistance to heat transfer is going to be on the air side of the interface, so the temperature at the interface is going to be much closer to the average water temperature than to the bulk air temperature. For this type of situation, the heat transfer coefficient to a sphere is approximately
h=2k_a/D=k_a/R
where ka is the thermal conductivity of air and D is the diameter of the sphere. This assumes that there is no natural convection, which would be the case if the sphere of water is levitated in the room since the water and the room are in free fall. Natural convection would enhance the rate of heat transfer, so using this equation for the heat transfer coefficient would predict the slowest rate of cooling. A heat balance on the sphere, assuming that the heat transfer resistance within the sphere is small compared to the heat transfer resistance outside the sphere gives:
\left(\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3\right)ρC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=-4\pi R^2h(T-T_a)
I leave it up to you to substitute the heat transfer coefficient into this equation, and work the equation into the mathematical form of Newton's law of cooling.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Many thanks Chestermiller. I feel nightmares from my thermodynamics classes flooding back. Really appreciate the work. Stay awesome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
35K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K