A general condition on polynomial roots

lunogled
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Consider a polynomial of the following type:

A_n w^n + A_{n-1} w^{n-1}k + A_{n-2} w^{n-2} k^2 + ... + A_1 k^n =0

What are the general conditions on {A_i} in order for the roots w(k) to be EITHER real OR functions with even imaginary parts, Im[w[k]]=Im[w[-k]]?

I would be interested in whether anyone has ever worked on this problem, or if this problem was ever shown to be unsolvable (perhaps there is a trivial connection to, e.g., Galois theory I missed).

Thanks, and best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey lunogled and welcome to the forums.

One way to look at this problem is in terms of the derivatives. If you order your turning points in order and you find that a pair of ordered points occurs on the same side of the x-axis, then you will have an imaginary root.

Think of it this way: if you have a real root, then the function will cross the x-axis at some point between the two-turning points and since one turning point will happen at a positive y value and another turning point will happen at a negative y value then if the function is continuous, it has to have a real root because it has to touch the x-axis and not only that, it will touch it only once due to some theorems in analysis/calculus but you can use an intuitive argument if you wish.

So easiest way to tell for a standard y = f(x) function, if you have this kind of condition, you should get an imaginary root if this happens, and to check this you need to solve the information for your first and possibly second derivatives (for inflection points) of your function.
 
I'm confused by your setup. Where do the A_n's live? Is w the indeterminate? If so, why do you have k's in there (i.e. why are you homogenizing)? If w(k) is a root, what does it mean for w(-k) to be a root? Is the k in w(k) a subscript or are you somehow viewing w as a function of k?

Please clarify...
 
morphism said:
I'm confused by your setup. Where do the A_n's live? Is w the indeterminate? If so, why do you have k's in there (i.e. why are you homogenizing)? If w(k) is a root, what does it mean for w(-k) to be a root? Is the k in w(k) a subscript or are you somehow viewing w as a function of k?

Please clarify...

A_{n} are numbers. w as a function of k is indeterminate, so if w(k) is a root, w(-k) is also a root, w is defined as a function of k
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top