A general question on finding the moment of inertia from oscillations.

AI Thread Summary
To find the moment of inertia of an object hung from its center of mass using the radius of the string, the period of oscillation, and the mass, one can apply principles of pendulum motion. The discussion suggests that the object behaves like a physical pendulum, where the oscillation period is related to its moment of inertia. It is important to assume small initial displacements, allowing the approximation sinθ = θ for simplification. Resources provided in the discussion offer further insights into the calculations involved. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately determining the moment of inertia through oscillation data.
gmpilot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to find the moment of inertia of an object that is hung from its center of mass, knowing the radius of the string, the period of the oscillation, and the mass of the object? I've been trying to think of how to do this and I don't even know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the object is hung from its center of mass then you're talking about a pendulum but I think you had some other kind of oscillation in mind?
 
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/SHM/PhysicalPendulum.html
http://www.uccp.org/docs/Lab%20Facilitator%20Manuals/Honors_Physics/HonPhys_Lab07_Pendulum.pdf
http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Class/phy51/phy51/node23.html

The big assumption is that the initial displacement is relatively small,
i.e. sinθ = θ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top