A little help with this Taylor expansion please?

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
I have this translation operator T(a) that acts on a function y(x) and causes the transformation T(a)y(x) = y(x+a).
I am supposed to be "expanding y(x+a) as a taylor series in a" to show that T(a)=eipa, where p is the operator p = -i.d/dx]
So, I've started out with the general equation for the Taylor expansion, to expand, say, f(x) about the point x=a:
f(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(x=a)}{n!} (x-a)^n

I've used this plenty of times before but only when I have been expanding something like f(x) rather than, say, f(x+c), so I'm making mistakes and messing up when I try and work through this problem.
Anyway, back to the original thing I'm trying to expand out. What I've got so far is:

y(x+a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}y(x+a = ?)}{n!}[(x+a)- ?]^n

Where I've left the question marks is where I'm not certain what to use. My y(x) expansion is otherwise the same way as the general formula for f(x) just with x+a replacing f(x).
I know I'm supposed to end up with something of the same form as e^x = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{x^n}{n!} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2} + ... but I just can't seem to get there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The taylor expansion of y(x+a) is the sum over n of D_n(y(x))*a^n/n! where D_n(y(x)) denotes the nth derivative of y evaluated at x, isn't it? Compare that with the operator expansion of exp(ipa) applied to y(x).
 
Thanks. This does work apparently:

Y(x+a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}Y(x)}{n!}a^n = \frac{1}{0!}a^0Y(x) + \frac{1}{1!}a^1\frac{d}{dx}Y(x) + \frac{1}{2!}a^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Y(x) + ...
= Y(x) + a\frac{d}{dx}Y(x) + \frac{1}{2!}a^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Y(x) + ...
= Y(x) + aipY(x) + \frac{1}{2}(aip)^2Y(x) + ...
= Y(x) + aipY(x) - \frac{1}{2}a^2p^2Y(x) + ...
= (1 + aip - \frac{1}{2}a^2p^2 + ...)Y(x)
= e^{iap}Y(x) = T(a)Y(x) where e^{iap} = 1 + aip - \frac{1}{2}a^2p^2 + ... and p = -i(d/dx)

However, I'm not sure why this is. I would not have been able to do this if you hadn't told me. Certainly this sort of thing would shaft me in an exam (which I have soon). How do we get from the basic Taylor series expansion for, say, y(x), to the one that you gave me for y(x+a)? If it's too much to be bothered typing out, a link to a webpage would be nice.
 
Last edited:
Your original form is
f(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(a)}{n!} (x-a)^n
Interchange a and x since you want the derivatives evaluated at x,
f(a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(x)}{n!} (a-x)^n
Now you don't want f(a) you want f(x+a), so put change a->x+a.
f(x+a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(x)}{n!} (a)^n
There's lot's of ways to write the taylor series.
 
Dick said:
Your original form is
f(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(a)}{n!} (x-a)^n
Interchange a and x since you want the derivatives evaluated at x,
f(a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(x)}{n!} (a-x)^n
Now you don't want f(a) you want f(x+a), so put change a->x+a.
f(x+a) = \sum^{\infty}_{0} \frac{\frac{d^n}{dx^n}f(x)}{n!} (a)^n
There's lot's of ways to write the taylor series.

ahh of course, thanks man... maths ey? it's always so simple in hindsight.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top