A mass m1 moving with u collides with mas m2...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vriska
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mechancis
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants analyze a collision between two masses, m1 and m2, where m1 is initially moving and m2 is stationary. The goal is to determine the fraction of energy converted into heat and sound, relating it to the kinetic energy in the center of mass reference frame. Key equations are used, including momentum conservation and kinetic energy expressions, but participants express confusion over the correct formulation and the role of elasticity in the system. It is clarified that if the system has elasticity, some kinetic energy will remain, contradicting the initial assumptions. The conversation emphasizes the need to eliminate certain variables to arrive at a correct solution.
Vriska
Messages
138
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A mass m1 collides with stationary m2 with velocity u1 u. Find the fraction of energy converted into heat and sound. Show that this energy is equal to the kinetic energy from centre of mass reference frame

Homework Equations


[/B]
let v1 and v2 be velocity of m1 and m2 after collision :

e = v2-v1/u1

m1u1 = m1v1 + m1v1

ke = 1/2 mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



let k be energy by sound and heat.

m1(u1-v1) = m2v2 (1)

m1u1^2 - m1v1^2 = k + m2v2^2

= m1(u1+v1) (u1-v1)

dividing by 1

u1+v1 = k/m2v2 + v2

u1 = k/m2v2 + v2 - v1

1 = k/(m2v2u1) + e

(1-e)*m2v2u1 = k

annnd stuck. this is the farthest I've gotten and doesn't look like velocity from com reference frame at all : (going further the ratio with initial ke is

(1-e)*m2/m1*v2/u1 which ia nice and symmetric i guess. but i guess it wants me to do stuff and rid off v2 and end up with an ugly expression. I don't think that's right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vriska said:
Show that this energy is equal to the kinetic energy from centre of mass reference frame
Based on that, I presume you were told that the masses stick together?
Vriska said:
m1u1^2 - m1v1^2 = k + m2v2^2
Should be 2k?

What is the initial KE in the common mass centre reference frame?
 
haruspex said:
Based on that, I presume you were told that the masses stick together?

Should be 2k?

What is the initial KE in the common mass centre reference frame?

right it's 2k.

initial ke looks to be
: m1m2* u^2/2(m1+m2). The final will be u replaced by ku i guess.

no mention is given about the elasticity of the system : \
 
Vriska said:
no mention is given about the elasticity of the system : \
The result you are asked to prove will not be true if there is any elasticity. There will remain some KE.
 
haruspex said:
The result you are asked to prove will not be true if there is any elasticity. There will remain some KE.

damn i was trying this all day : (

but then shouldn't my answer have m1^2 instead of m1m2?

Anyway here's the question in case I'm misreading something
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20171025-174606.png
    Screenshot_20171025-174606.png
    28.7 KB · Views: 491
Vriska said:
shouldn't my answer have m1^2 instead of m1m2?
It should not have v2. Use the equations you have to eliminate that and see what happens.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top