A missle coliding witha satelite

  • Thread starter Thread starter talolard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satelite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the collision between a missile and a satellite, highlighting the differing motion of the two objects—circular orbit for the satellite and radial direction for the missile. Participants emphasize that the velocities are perpendicular, necessitating vector addition to determine total momentum before the collision. While one user mentions successfully using conservation of energy in a previous solution, confusion arises regarding the application of momentum conservation. It is clarified that the initial momentum must be calculated as vectors due to their differing directions. The conversation concludes with the importance of accurately calculating the velocity of the combined mass after the collision for a correct solution.
talolard
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I typed it in word. Is this correct?
Thanks
Tal
attachment.php?attachmentid=27074&d=1279734034.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Phys Q.JPG
    Phys Q.JPG
    36.3 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the satellite moving in a circular orbit and the missile in the radial direction? It seems to me that their velocities are perpendicular to each other which means you have a collision in two dimensions.
 
I agree but i don't see what that means.
 
talolard said:
I agree but i don't see what that means.
It means that the sum of the two momentum vectors before the collision is equal to the single momentum vector after the collision. How do you two add vectors that are perpendicular to each other?
 
Standard vector addition?
I don't see how vectors are relevant though because all of my quantities are scalrs and not vectors.

I solved this problem correctly previously using conservation of energy but I don't understand why momentum is wrong.
 
talolard said:
Standard vector addition?
I don't see how vectors are relevant though because all of my quantities are scalrs and not vectors.
The initial momentum of the satellite is not in the same direction as the initial momentum of the missile. Therefore, to find the total initial momentum, you need to add the two as vectors. You need the total initial momentum to use in the momentum conservation equation.
I solved this problem correctly previously using conservation of energy but I don't understand why momentum is wrong.
It is correct to use energy conservation after the collision is completed, however the solution will not be correct unless the velocity of of the composite mass immediately after the collision is calculated correctly.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top