Testing A.P. Physics B exam for regular physics student

AI Thread Summary
Preparing for the A.P. Physics B exam requires more than just the content covered in a regular physics class, which often moves at a slower pace. Self-study is essential to succeed, as the exam expects a deeper understanding and better problem-solving skills. Recommended resources include the Princeton Review book and online videos that cover the necessary material. While the exam does not introduce significantly more content than a standard physics course, it demands a greater depth of knowledge and the ability to derive or memorize key equations. Regular practice tests are crucial for effective preparation.
blondie :)
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am planning to take the A.P. Physics exam B at the end of the school year. My question is, will this be ridiculously difficult for me? In my regular physics class, we have quite a slow pace on moving forward (We're only on centripital force!). How much will I need to know in order to pass the exam?

Thanks,

Mitch Guzman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blondie :) said:
I am planning to take the A.P. Physics exam B at the end of the school year. My question is, will this be ridiculously difficult for me? In my regular physics class, we have quite a slow pace on moving forward (We're only on centripital force!). How much will I need to know in order to pass the exam?

A regular physics class will not, on its own, prepare you for the ap physics b exam. If you want to do it, you will have to self study. My advice would be to get a princeton review book or 5 steps to a 5. Also, http://www.archive.org/details/ap_physics_b" has a lot of good videos that covers all of the material.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's what I figured. Thanks for the reply, and I'll make sure and go get the princeton review book.
 
The biggest thing would to do plenty of practice tests.
The AP Test doesn't cover that much more content than the a regular level physics class, just a little bit more in depth, expects better problem solving skills and either to derive important equations, or to have them memorized.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top