A problem about virtual work principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying the virtual work principle to derive the equilibrium equation for a continuous mechanical system, specifically a long thin bar fixed at one end and subjected to pressure at the other. The user struggles to derive the correct equilibrium equations, noting that the terms from their calculations lead to a condition that does not provide information on tension (T). They emphasize the importance of considering a neglected third term in the equations. The user seeks expert advice to resolve these issues and correctly apply the virtual work principle. Clarification on the treatment of boundary conditions and the inclusion of all relevant terms is necessary for accurate derivation.
athosanian
Messages
66
Reaction score
8
hello, I want to apply the virtual work principle to a continuous mechanical system to derive equilibrium equation, naemly, a long thin bar with one end fixed in the wall and other end applied with pressure P. but I can not derive the correct equilibrium equations. I hope some expert could give some advice.
my thhinking is shown below:
?temp_hash=1576381b83a3354a61cab8b6a348bfb3.png


?temp_hash=1576381b83a3354a61cab8b6a348bfb3.png


?temp_hash=1576381b83a3354a61cab8b6a348bfb3.png
 

Attachments

  • virtual work-1.png
    virtual work-1.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 546
  • virtual work-2.png
    virtual work-2.png
    55.1 KB · Views: 562
  • virtual work-3.png
    virtual work-3.png
    11 KB · Views: 547
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously, if the two terms from (4) result in ## T \delta u |_0^L = 0 ##, which gives you no condition on ##T## because ## \delta u(0) = \delta u(L) = 0 ##, it is the neglected third term that you must take into account.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top