A problem in Hoffman's Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of diagonalizable linear operators as presented in Hoffman's Linear Algebra, specifically on Page 243. It establishes that if T is a diagonalizable linear operator, every T-invariant subspace possesses a complementary T-invariant subspace, and vice versa. The participants suggest two methods to prove this: one using the basis of eigenvectors and the other leveraging the self-adjoint property of T. Both approaches confirm the T-invariance of orthogonal complements of T-invariant subspaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diagonalizable linear operators
  • Familiarity with eigenvectors and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of T-invariant subspaces
  • Basic concepts of inner product spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of diagonalizable operators in linear algebra
  • Explore the properties of eigenvectors and their significance
  • Learn about T-invariant subspaces and their applications
  • Investigate self-adjoint operators and their implications in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on operator theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of diagonalizable operators and their properties.

tghg
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A problem in Hoffman's Linear Algebra.
Page 243

18. If T is a diagonalizable linear operator, then every T-invariant subspace has a complementary T-invariant subspace. And vice versa.

In fact, the answer lies on Pages 263~265,but I try not to use the conception T-admissible to prove this proposition.
Could someone help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of different ways to do that:

The fact that T is "diagonalizable" means that there exist a basis for the vector space consisting entirely of eigenvectors of T (so that the matrix for T in that basis is diagonal). Using that, clearly any T-invariant subspace is spanned by some subset of those eigenvectors and it's orthogonal complement is spanned by the remaining eigenvectors- and so is T-invariant itself.

Or you could use the fact that, since T is diagonalizable, it is "self adjoint": for any vector u,v <Tu, v>= <u, Tv> where <u, v> is the inner product of u and v. That should make it easy to show that if a subspaced is T-invariant, then so is its orthogonal complement.
 
How about the Inversion of the proposition?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K