A problem with a power rule proof

madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


y=xn
<=>
ln(y)=nln(x)
<=>d/dx ln(y) = d/dx n ln(x) <=> y'/y=n/x
<=> y'=y*n/x=x^n*x/x=nx^(n-1)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


but doesn't this proof only hold for positive x? because ln a negative number is undefined or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it does. What you could do is note that for even n, (-x)^n= x^n and for odd n, (-x)^n= -x^n to extend from positive to negative numbers. Of course, you would still have to do x= 0 separately but sinced 0^n= 0, that is easy. That only proves it for the power a positive integer but x any real number.

But, personally, I would consider that proof "overkill". Lograrithms are much more advanced than polynomials so I would expect to know the derivative of x^n long before the derivative of logarithm.

Prove (x^n)&#039;= n x^{n-1} for positive integer n by induction on n:
If n= 1, x^n= x and its derivative is 1= 1(x^0).

Now, suppose (x^k)&#039;= k x^{k-1} for some k. Then x^{k+1}= (x^k)(x) so using the product rule,
(x^{k+1})&#039;= (x^k)&#039;(x)+ (x^k)(x&#039;)= (kx^{k-1})x+ (x^k)(1)= kx^k+ x^k= (k+1)x^k.

You could then use the quotient rule to extend (x^n)&#039;= n x^{n-1} to negative n.

But x^r where r is an arbitrary rational or irrational number is only defined for x positive anyway so you can use the "logarithm" proof for those.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top