A question about the derivative

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flumpster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Flumpster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Generally the derivative has the limit x-- h applied to the whole thing like
$$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$$

I'm guessing you can't express it as

$$\frac{\lim_{h\to 0} f(x+h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$

because the quotient rule for limits doesn't hold when the limit of bottom part of the fraction equals 0.

Can you express it like this though?

$$\frac{f(x +\lim_{h\to 0} h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$

In other words, does $$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} = \frac{f(x +\lim_{h\to 0} h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flumpster said:

Homework Statement



Generally the derivative has the limit x-- h applied to the whole thing like
$$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$$

I'm guessing you can't express it as

$$\frac{\lim_{h\to 0} f(x+h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$

because the quotient rule for limits doesn't hold when the limit of bottom part of the fraction equals 0.

Can you express it like this though?

$$\frac{f(x +\lim_{h\to 0} h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$

In other words, does $$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} = \frac{f(x +\lim_{h\to 0} h)-f(x)}{\lim_{h\to 0} h}$$ ?

The limit of the denominator is zero in that expression too. So, no, you can't do that.
 
Besides what SammyS said, you can't in general "distribute" the limit operation into a function.

IOW, it's generally not true that
## \lim_{h \to 0} f(x + h) = f(x + \lim_{h \to 0} h)##
 
Your latter formula means the denominator and the numerator are not synchronized when h--->0
Could you understand me?
 
Bennett.F.L said:
Your latter formula means the denominator and the numerator are not synchronized when h--->0
Could you understand me?
Who is this directed to, and what do you mean?
 
Thanks, Mark44 and SammyS :)
Bennett.F.L, I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. It's ok though, I think I got it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top