A question on air pressure & altitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of altitude on the pressure experienced by compressed air supply hoses. At sea level, a system operating at 100 psi gauge pressure will not experience a proportional increase in pressure when taken to 8000 feet. Instead, the absolute pressure remains constant, resulting in a gauge pressure of approximately 103.8 psi at that altitude. The stress on the hoses is determined by the internal pressure, which does not change with altitude, but rather with temperature fluctuations. Understanding these principles is crucial for ensuring the integrity of compressed air systems at varying altitudes.
Dave-h
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good afternoon Ladies & Gents,

A question about the effect of air pressure on compressed air supply hoses.

On the web site: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-25_462.html the absolute air pressure at 0 feet and 8000 feet, are given as 14.696 and 10.91 psi respectively - a reduction of around 25% when moving from sea level to 8000 feet.

If a compressed air system that operates at 100psi at sea level, is taken to 8000 feet, would the connecting air hoses be experiencing the stress equivalent to 125psi at sea level?

Thanks

Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all you have to specify whether it is gauge pressure or absolute pressure. If it is gauge pressure then net effect(the difference of internal and external pressures) on hose wall remains same.

If it is absolute pressure, then there is a difference of (14.696-10.91) = 3.786psig (higher at higher altitude)

Regards,
 
In terms of simply the stresses induced due to the pressure in the tube/pipe, no. Since you would undoubtedly be talking about 100 psig. The age old \sigma = (P*R)/t does not involve a difference in pressure, simply the internal. The stress induced due to pressure is a function of the material. Think of a beam being bent in a vacuum. The stresses on that would be no different that if it were done in some other atmosphere.
 
Thank you both for your replies.

Perhaps a little more explanation on my part would have helped.

The question really relates back to the hose characteristics, and whether a hose that can cope with a little over 100psi at sea level, would be able to cope at 8000 feet.

I was trying to understand what would happen if one was to take a system, charged with 100psi at sea level, up to 8000 feet. Would the pressure in the system be increased by the same proportion as the external air pressure was reduced (ie 25%) - so would the 100psi become in effect 125psi?

Thanks,

Dave
 
If the system is charged to 100 psi gauge (psig) at sea level and sealed off, then at an altitude of 8000 feet, the pressure would be 103.786 psig, not some percentage more.

Think of it this way, the absolute pressure inside the system at sea level is 114.7 psi absolute (psia), and that stays the same regardless of altitude. Only temperature can change that number, so if your system gets cold it will decrease in pressure, and when heated it will increase in pressure.

So at sea level you have 114.7 psia on the inside and 14.7 psia on the outside, so the net difference is 100 psig which we read as "gauge pressure".

At 8000 feet, you have 114.7 psia on the inside and 10.9 psia on the outside, so the net difference is 103.8 psig. You should be able to measure that with a regular pressure gage.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top