What is the correct equation for finding path difference in CD diffraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter unscientific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct equation for calculating path difference in CD diffraction when white light is shone on a tilted CD. The initial path difference was calculated as d cos (90 + 5 - ∅) = (1)(λ), but confusion arose regarding the additional term d cos (90 - 5) in the provided solution. The additional term accounts for the path length differences caused by the tilt of the CD and the angle of the observer. It was clarified that the tilt results in different path lengths for the beams, with one beam traveling further than the other. Understanding this concept resolves the confusion regarding the path difference calculation.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


White light was shone vertically down on a cd tilted 5°, with adjacent tracks d = 720 nm. An observer some distance away observes a color of light. Determine that wavelength of light observed. (Refer to picture attachment)





Homework Equations


finding path difference


The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that finding the path difference is key to solving this problem. So, i found the path difference to be simply:

d cos (90+ 5 - ∅) = (1)(λ)


But the answer wrote path difference =
d cos (90 + 5 - ∅) - d cos (90 - 5)


Using the provided answer, it didnt make sense to me for the additional term of ' d cos (90 - 5)' to be there?
 

Attachments

  • cd diffraction.jpg
    cd diffraction.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 441
  • cd diffraction2.jpg
    cd diffraction2.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 410
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there will be path length differences from the 5 degree tilt of the cd and from the angle of the viewer, see sketch below,
 

Attachments

  • block090.jpg
    block090.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 456
hmm i still don't seem to be able to grasp the answer..
 
Look at the sketch and follow the two paths. Calculate the path length difference from the first dashed line to the second dashed line. I think you will find the required answer.
 
Spinnor said:
Look at the sketch and follow the two paths. Calculate the path length difference from the first dashed line to the second dashed line. I think you will find the required answer.

OH i get it! the tilting causes path difference before and after diffration at surface!

the right beam has to go down more while the left beam has to travel more!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top