A Question On Electron Microscopy (TEM)

kranav
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello!
The question is as follows:

1. You are provided with a 1 cm3 of biological sample from which 0.1 mm thin sections are cut. A search for virus cells at a magnification of 100,000 has been proposed. The fluorescent screen on which the image is to be projected has a diameter of 15 cm.

(a) How many fields need to be searched to cover an area of 0.1 mm2?

(b) What percentage of the original sample does the searched volume represent?

(c) Comment on the significance of the calculated values.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know of any formulas for this question.
The magnification might be a key here.
Can I find the resolution of the TEM using this?
or maybe the max distance squared I get at 100000 mags (one field) and then use that to calculate the total number of fields to cover 0.1 mm2 ?

In the second part I can do the same (find the area at 100000 mags) and get the percentage.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is meant by field ?
Resolution depends on the wavelength/energy of electron beam used in TEM.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top