A Question on Semantics Regarding Group Theory

Mindstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is the set of a single element {e} with the multiplication law ee = e a group?

Homework Equations


none.

The Attempt at a Solution


Yes, it is a group. But that is not my question. My question is how do you ask the question? If I were face to face with you and wanted to ask you the question, would I say, "Is the set of a single element e with the multiplication law e multiplied by ANOTHER e (another element in the group) equivalent to the identity element?"

Also, if I am wrong about it being a group...who cares. If I get the semantics down first, I will better understand what the problem is asking.

Thanks everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mindstein.
I am not sure I get your question.
{e} is a group (for say, multiplication) IF e is the neutral element (or identity).
for any group whose neutral element is e, {e} is (with the group itself) the trivial subgroup.
What do you mean 'another e' ?
If you are thinking that you can take any element of the original group and take put it in a sngleton and wonder if this singleton is also a group, than the answer is no. it's only valid for e.
for instance, take (N, +), 0 is its 'e', so {0} is a group, but {1} is not since 1+1 does not belong to {1}
sorry if I didn't get your question

cheers...
 
Hi Mindstein! :smile:
Mindstein said:
Is the set of a single element {e} with the multiplication law ee = e a group?

Yes.

If you're worried that you can't pick two e's in S, it doesn't matter …

the law about multiplication is defined on S x S, not on S itself (where S is the set),

and (e,e) is an element of S x S :wink:
 
Thanks tiny-tim and oli4, you all sure do know how to get a brother past his problems!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top