A question regarding energy and momentum conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a wedge and block system where gravitational force acts without friction. Participants debate whether to apply conservation of momentum and energy to find the final velocities of the block and wedge. It is clarified that the block's velocity before and after separation is the same, indicating that energy is not conserved in terms of kinetic energy, as potential energy is converted. The conversation also touches on the differences in kinetic energy between simple inclined planes and curved planes, emphasizing that the approach to solving the problem remains consistent. Ultimately, the consensus is that both conservation laws can be applied to solve the problem correctly.
jehwig0107
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, no template.
Rgj2w.png


I have a problem in mechanics.

On the wedge and block only the gravisational force (mg) is exerted (and there is no friction in this system).

What is asked in the question is the final velocities of the wedge and the block (vB, vK). The velocity of the block is conserved when it reaches at the ground.

Do I need to solve this question with the conservation of momentum and conservation of energy? (this is what the solution tolds me) It seems to me that it is absurd, because if the momentum is conserved, then the total energy is encreased.

When we compare two energies:

1) E just before the separation : 0.5*(mB * vB^2 + mK * vK'^2) = mB * g * h

And when the momentum for horizontal direction is conserved : mB * vB'x - mK * vK' = mB * vB - mK * vK = 0

(vB' is the velocity of Block just before the seperation, and its magnitude is same with vB, the final velocity. vB'x is the horizontal component of vB')

vK is thus greater than vK' (because vB is greater than vB'x)

2) E after the separation : 0.5*(mB * vB^2 + mK * vK^2) > mB * g * h (1)

Therefore the total energy is not conserved if the horizontal momentum is conserved.

Am I wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Rgj2w.png
    Rgj2w.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 791
Physics news on Phys.org
jehwig0107 said:
if the momentum is conserved, then the total energy is encreased.
No, this is not correct. If energy conservation is one of your criteria and momentum conservation the other, obviously the solution must reflect this.
jehwig0107 said:
vB' is the velocity of Block just before the seperation, and its magnitude is same with vB
This is not correct. There is no reason to assume this.
 
Orodruin said:
No, this is not correct. If energy conservation is one of your criteria and momentum conservation the other, obviously the solution must reflect this.

This is not correct. There is no reason to assume this.

This condision is given by the question.
"The velocity of the block is conserved when it reaches at the ground."
That means, the magnitude of vB' (the velocity just before the seperation) is same with vB (the velocity after saperation).
 
jehwig0107 said:
This condision is given by the question.
"The velocity of the block is conserved when it reaches at the ground."
That means, the magnitude of vB' (the velocity just before the seperation) is same with vB (the velocity after saperation).

All that means is that the block doesn't lose energy hitting the ground. The slope tapers off so there is a smooth transition to horizontal motion at the end of the slope.
 
jehwig0107 said:
Do I need to solve this question with the conservation of momentum and conservation of energy? (this is what the solution tolds me) It seems to me that it is absurd, because if the momentum is conserved, then the total energy is encreased.

Kinetic energy is not conserved. The initial KE is zero. But, you have initial potential energy in the system.
 
PeroK said:
All that means is that the block doesn't lose energy hitting the ground. The slope tapers off so there is a smooth transition to horizontal motion at the end of the slope.

You mean that magnitude of vB' is differ from magnitude of vB?

And you mean that the velocity of slope is encreased because of the potential energy (mgh)?
That means, the velocity of slope is faster, compair to the case, if the velocity of block is not conserved?
 
jehwig0107 said:
You mean that magnitude of vB' is differ from magnitude of vB?

And you mean that the velocity of slope is encreased because of the potential energy (mgh)?
That means, the velocity of slope is faster, compair to the case, if the velocity of block is not conserved?

No. I mean that in this problem there is no difference between ##vB## and ##vB'##. They are both the speed of the block when all the potential energy has been converted to Kinetic Energy.

You are making this problem too complicated. You don't have to worry about any complications when the block slides off the wedge.

You can use conservation of energy and (horizontal) momentum to solve the problem.
 
PeroK said:
No. I mean that in this problem there is no difference between ##vB## and ##vB'##. They are both the speed of the block when all the potential energy has been converted to Kinetic Energy.

You are making this problem too complicated. You don't have to worry about any complications when the block slides off the wedge.

You can use conservation of energy and (horizontal) momentum to solve the problem.
Thank you for your reply.
I am just wonderning now: Is there any difference between the kinetic energies just before the separation (1) in the case of simple inclined plane without curved edge (unlike the question above, there is no velocity conservation by collision with the ground) and (2) in curved plane?
 
jehwig0107 said:
Thank you for your reply.
I am just wonderning now: Is there any difference between the kinetic energies just before the separation (1) in the case of simple inclined plane without curved edge (unlike the question above, there is no velocity conservation by collision with the ground) and (2) in curved plane?

If it was a simple wedge, then its speed would be the same as in your problem, but it would have a vertical component of velocity on impact with the ground. The horizontal component of its velocity would be different, so that would be a different problem.
 
  • #10
Alternative approach:

"Reverse time" event is a perfectly inelastic collision in which two objects with masses mB and mk having approach velocities vB and vk respectively come to a simultaneous standstill. Collision energy ΔE is not lost but converted to PE. Hence equations pertaining to perfectly inelastic collisions applicable:

$$ΔE = ½μΔv^2=m_Bgh...1$$ and collision impulse $$Δp=μΔv...2$$ where μ is the reduced mass of the colliding objects $$μ=\frac{m_Bm_K}{m_B+m_K}$$ and Δv their relative velocity.

Obtain Δv from ...1 and simply divide Δp from ...2 by the respective masses to obtain respective velocities. The problem is a variant of Problem 4 in the following problem set which can be solved by similar means.

http://web.mit.edu/8.01t/www/materials/ProblemSets/Raw/f12/ps07sol.pdf
 
Last edited:
Back
Top