A question regarding the number of fermions with a certain velocity component

Jopi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the number of electrons whose velocity's x-component is between [x,x+dx] is given by
<br /> dN = \frac{4\pi V m^2 k_B T}{h^3} ln [exp(\frac{E_F -mv_x^2/2}{k_B T})+1]dv_x<br />

Homework Equations


The Fermi-Dirac Distribution function:
<br /> \frac{dn}{dE}=\frac{4\pi V \sqrt{2m^3}}{h^3}\frac{\sqrt{E}}{exp \left((E-E_F)/ k_B T\right) +1}<br />

Where E is kinetic energy,
<br /> E=\frac{1}{2} m v^2.<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I used the definition of kinetic energy above to rewrite the distribution as a function of velocity. I got
<br /> dn=\frac{V m^{3/2}}{h^3}\frac{1}{exp((\frac{1}{2} m v^2 -E_F)/k_B T) +1} 4 \pi v^2 dv<br />

Now, we know that
<br /> 4 \pi v^2 dv = dv_x dv_y dv_z.<br />

Now I should be able to get the number of particles with vx in the given range by integratin out dvy and dvz. In the assignment it is suggested that I write
<br /> t^2=v_y^2+v_z^2<br />
and then I can use the formula
<br /> \int_0^{\infty} (ae^x+1)^{-1}dx=ln(1+\frac{1}{a}).<br />

But I don't know how to do that. What is the differential element dvydvz written with dt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jopi said:
But I don't know how to do that. What is the differential element dvydvz written with dt?

Think of vy and vz as cartesian coordinates, and t as the radial coordinate in the plane.

You should then be able to derive/remember the 2-D analog of the equation you have already written down:
<br /> 4 \pi v^2 dv = dv_x dv_y dv_z.<br />
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top